ArticleScientific reports2024
Divergent associations of inflammatory markers with bone turnover markers in elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic biomarkers for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head : a systematic review and pathophysiological cascade network.Bone & joint research · 2026Pooled it
- Association between platelet to lymphocyte ratio and the risk of vertebral fracture in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Association between immune-inflammatory index and osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and refracture risk in hip fracture patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in osteoporosis: mechanistic links to bone remodeling imbalance and therapeutic perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of nine inflammatory biomarkers for 30-day mortality in critically ill elderly patients with osteoporotic hip fracture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Aging-related metabolic dysregulation in osteoporosis: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Association between bone turnover markers and alveolar socket healing rate: A cross-sectional study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Association between pan-immune-inflammation value and bone turnover markers in Chinese patients with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Advanced lung cancer inflammation index as a diagnostic indicator of bone turnover in osteoporotic fracture patients: a non-linear analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Mediating role of inflammatory markers in the relationship between cotinine levels and total bone mineral density.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The association between inflammatory markers (IMs) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in osteoporotic fracture patients has not been comprehensively studied. Therefore, this study examined the correlation between the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), or Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and BTMs in osteoporosis (OP) fracture patients. This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 740 OP fracture patients admitted to the hospital from January 2017 to July 2022. MLR, NLR, and PLR were calculated based on each patient's complete blood count. The relationship between IMs and BTMs was assessed using three models by adjusting variables. Furthermore, the potential curve relationship between IMs and BTMs was also determined via the threshold effect analysis and curve fittings. In addition, stratified analysis was performed on each adjusted variable to confirm the stability of the results. After adjusting the variables, the results showed that NLR was negatively correlated with procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) (β = -1.1788, 95% CI: -1.7230 to -0.6345, P-value < 0.0001) and β-C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX) (β = -0.0104, 95% CI: -0.0145 to -0.0062, P-value < 0.0001), Furthermore, MLR was negatively correlated with P1NP (β = -17.4523, 95% CI: -27.7335 to -7.1710, P-value = 0.0009) and β-CTX (β = -0.1327, 95% CI: -0.2211 to -0.0443, P-value = 0.0034). However, PLR indicated a positive correlation with P1NP (β = 0.0326, 95% CI: 0.0007 to 0.0645, P-value = 0.0458) and β-CTX (β = 0.0003, 95% CI: 0.0001 to 0.0006, P-value = 0.0204). The threshold effect analysis and curve fittings revealed the presence of a turning point between NLR, MLR, and P1NP, β-CTX. In addition, the stratified analysis validated the result's stability. In conclusion, this study indicates a negative correlation between NLR and MLR with P1NP, while PLR shows a positive correlation with P1NP. Additionally, NLR and MLR exhibit a negative correlation with β-CTX, whereas PLR demonstrates a positive correlation with β-CTX. Further research is required to assess the intricate mechanisms linking IM with bone metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.