Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A predictive model for secondary central nervous system infection after craniotomy based on machine learning.

Junjie Chen, Tingting Hu, Jiuxiao Yang, Xiao Yang, Hui Zhong, Zujian Zhang, Fei Wang, Xin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junjie Chen *People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Tingting Hu *Medicine and Engineering Interdisciplinary Research Laboratory of Nursing & Materials, West China Hospital, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Jiuxiao YangPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Xiao YangPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Hui ZhongPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Zujian ZhangPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Fei WangPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China.
Xin LiPeople's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, 618000, Sichuan, China. 389568085@qq.com.

Funding

Scientific Research Project of the Sichuan Provincial Health Informatics Society 2023026The Science and Technology Project of Deyang City 2022SCZ140The Special Incubation Project of the People's Hospital of Deyang FHT202308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the risk factors of secondary Central nervous system infections (CNSIs) after craniotomy, and to establish an individualized predictive model for CNSIs risk. The independent risk factors were screened by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression, naive bayes, random forest, light GBM and adaboost algorithms were used to establish predictive models for secondary CNSIs after craniotomy. The predictive model based on the Adaboost algorithm demonstrated superior prediction performance compared to the other four models. Under 5-fold cross validation, the accuracy was 0.80, the precision was 0.69, the recall was 0.85, the F1-score was 0.76, the area under the ROC curve was 0.897,and the average precision was 0.880. The top 5 variables of importance in Adaboost model were operation time, indwelling time of lumbar drainage tube, indwelling lumbar drainage tube during operation, indwelling epidural drainage tube during operation, and GCS score. In addition, Adaboost model with the best prediction performance was used for clinical verification, and the prediction results were compared with the actual occurrence of CNSIs after surgery. The results showed that the accuracy of Adaboost model in predicting CNSIs was 60%, the accuracy of Adaboost model in predicting non-CNSIS was 92%, and the overall prediction accuracy was 76%.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System InfectionsCraniotomyMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsROC CurveYoung AdultCentral nervous system infectionCraniotomyMachine learningPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID39438511
PMCPMC11496797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.