ArticleScientific reports2024
Assessment of the relationship between central venous pressure waveform and the severity of tricuspid valve regurgitation using data science.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The relationship between the height of the V wave in the central venous pressure (CVP) waveform and the severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is well known. Their diagnostic ability is unconfirmed. This study explored CVP waveform variations with TR. Methods All patients who underwent preoperative echocardiography and CVP waveform measurements before surgery at our institution were included. Indices were created to capture each feature of the CVP waveform. The median value for each case was obtained and statistically analyzed according to the severity of TR. A deep learning technique, Transformer, was used to handle the complex features of CVP waveforms. Results This study included 436 cases. The values for C wave - Y descent, X descent - Y descent, and V wave - Y descent differed significantly in the Jonckheere-Terpstra test (p = 0.0018, 0.027, and 0.077, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for X descent - Y descent in two groups, none to moderate TR and severe TR, was 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.68, 0.98]). For Transformer, the accuracy of the validation dataset was 0.97. Conclusions The shape of the CVP waveform varied with the severity of TR in a large dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.