Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438500›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An appropriate artificial intelligence technique for plastic materials recycling using bipolar dual hesitant fuzzy set.

Lakshmanaraj Ramya, Chakkarapani Sumathi Thilagasree, Thippan Jayakumar, Antony Kishore Peter, Emelia Akashah P Akhir, Massimiliano Ferrara, Ali Ahmadian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lakshmanaraj RamyaDepartment of Mathematics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641046, India.
Chakkarapani Sumathi ThilagasreeDepartment of Mathematics, SRMV College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India.
Thippan JayakumarDepartment of Mathematics, SRMV College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India.
Antony Kishore PeterSystems Engineering Department, Military Technological College, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Emelia Akashah P AkhirComputer and Information Sciences Department, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar, Malaysia.
Massimiliano FerraraDecisions Lab, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy. massimiliano.ferrara@unirc.it.
Ali AhmadianDecisions Lab, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy. ahmadian.hosseini@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic recycling has become more important than ever as the globe struggles with growing environmental issues. This research explores the significant environmental impact of recycling plastic and its growing relevance. The pervasive material known as plastic presents a complex risk to both human health and ecosystems in contemporary life. It exacerbates problems including marine pollution, habitat damage, and wildlife entanglement because of its persistence in landfills and seas, which leads to serious ecological deterioration. In addition, producing plastic uses a lot of energy and produces a lot of greenhouse gas emissions, which exacerbate climate change. Through the use of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), this study emphasizes how vital it is to support recycling activities in order to protect the environment and promote a sustainable future. The elimination and choice ex-pressing reality (ELECTRE) approach is used to rank the alternatives in this proposed research study that employs bipolar dual hesitant fuzzy sets (BDHFs). The most efficient and versatile outranking method for making decisions is the BDHF-ELECTRE approach. The weights of environment, economic, social, technical, and finally safety is computed using the entropy distance metric. The economic factor received the highest score of 0.2945 among the other factors since economic considerations are crucial in choosing the most efficient plastic recycling method, as they ensure sustainability, cost-effectiveness, resource allocation, and overall feasibility in managing plastic waste. The decision-makers determined that the mechanical recycling approach ought to be prioritized over all others for the efficient recycling of plastic waste. The robustness of the system is examined in the sensitive and comparative analyses. The proposed MCDM technique thus presents a viable solution, mitigating the adverse effects of plastic waste by conserving resources, reducing energy consumption, and curbing pollution.

Indexed as

Bipolar dual hesitant fuzzy setELECTRE methodEntropy distance measureMCDMPlastic recycling techniques

Identifiers

PMID39438500
PMCPMC11496637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.