ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
CRISPR-Cas systems in enterococci.
Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the emerging role of CRISPR-Cas systems in probiotic development.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
- Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026Review
- Phenotypic and genomic analysis of the emerging poultry pathogenMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Relationship Between CRISPR-Cas Systems and Acquisition of Tetracycline Resistance in Non-ClinicalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enterococci are members of the microbiota of humans and other animals. They can also be found in the environment, associated with food, healthcare infections, and hospital settings. Due to their wide distribution, they are inserted in the One Health context. The selective pressure caused by the extensive use of antimicrobial agents in humans, animals, and agriculture has increased the frequency of resistance to various drugs among enterococcal species. CRISPR-Cas system, an important prokaryotic defense mechanism against the entry of mobile genetic elements, may prevent the acquisition of genes involved in antimicrobial resistance and virulence. This system has been increasingly used as a gene editing tool, which can be used as a way to recognize and inactivate genes of interest. Here, we conduct a review on CRISPR systems found in enterococci, considering their occurrence, structure and organization, mechanisms of action and use as a genetic engineering technology. Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems were shown to be the most frequent among enterococcal species, and the orphan CRISPR2 was the most commonly found system (54.1%) among enterococcal species, especially in Enterococcus faecalis. Distribution of CRISPR systems varied among species. CRISPR systems had 1 to 20 spacers, with size between 23 and 37 bp and direct repeat sequences from 25 to 37 bp. Several applications of the CRISPR-Cas biotechnology have been described in enterococci, mostly in vitro, using this editing tool to target resistance- and virulence-related genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.