Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438415›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

CRISPR-Cas systems in enterococci.

Amanda Seabra Cabral, Fernanda de Freitas Lacerda, Vitor Luis Macena Leite, Filipe Martire de Miranda, Amanda Beiral da Silva, Bárbara Araújo Dos Santos, Jailton Lobo da Costa Lima, Lúcia Martins Teixeira, Felipe Piedade Gonçalves Neves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda Seabra CabralInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Fernanda de Freitas LacerdaInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Vitor Luis Macena LeiteInstituto de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-590, Brazil.
Filipe Martire de MirandaInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Amanda Beiral da SilvaInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Bárbara Araújo Dos SantosInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Jailton Lobo da Costa LimaInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil.
Lúcia Martins TeixeiraInstituto de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-590, Brazil.
Felipe Piedade Gonçalves NevesInstituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Alameda Barros Terra, S/N, São Domingos, Niterói, RJ, 24020-150, Brazil. fpgneves@id.uff.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-2540

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308059/2021-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/200.855/2021Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/210.103/2020Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/211.554/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are members of the microbiota of humans and other animals. They can also be found in the environment, associated with food, healthcare infections, and hospital settings. Due to their wide distribution, they are inserted in the One Health context. The selective pressure caused by the extensive use of antimicrobial agents in humans, animals, and agriculture has increased the frequency of resistance to various drugs among enterococcal species. CRISPR-Cas system, an important prokaryotic defense mechanism against the entry of mobile genetic elements, may prevent the acquisition of genes involved in antimicrobial resistance and virulence. This system has been increasingly used as a gene editing tool, which can be used as a way to recognize and inactivate genes of interest. Here, we conduct a review on CRISPR systems found in enterococci, considering their occurrence, structure and organization, mechanisms of action and use as a genetic engineering technology. Type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems were shown to be the most frequent among enterococcal species, and the orphan CRISPR2 was the most commonly found system (54.1%) among enterococcal species, especially in Enterococcus faecalis. Distribution of CRISPR systems varied among species. CRISPR systems had 1 to 20 spacers, with size between 23 and 37 bp and direct repeat sequences from 25 to 37 bp. Several applications of the CRISPR-Cas biotechnology have been described in enterococci, mostly in vitro, using this editing tool to target resistance- and virulence-related genes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEnterococcusAnimalsGene EditingHumansCRISPR-CasEnterococcus spp.Gene editing

Identifiers

PMID39438415
PMCPMC11711564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.