Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438393›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2024

Comparison of Vancomycin AUC24 Calculation Methods for Neonates and Infants.

Tuomas Laitila, Ulla Sankilampi, Marjo Renko, Merja Kokki, Veli-Pekka Ranta

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vancomycin AUCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tuomas LaitilaKuopio University Hospital Pharmacy, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1032-3303
Ulla SankilampiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0789-9720
Marjo RenkoDepartment of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-4773
Merja KokkiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1501-7537
Veli-Pekka RantaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 C, 70210, Kuopio, Finland. veli-pekka.ranta@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5992-5517

Funding

Itä-Suomen Yliopisto 12024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveFor neonates and infants receiving intermittent vancomycin infusions, the area under the concentration-time curve during 24 h (AUC24) is often estimated with Bayesian forecasting using one or more measured vancomycin concentrations. When practical peak and trough concentrations are measured at steady state, AUC24 can also be calculated with first-order steady-state equations for a one-compartment model (Sawchuk-Zaske method), but previously this method has been applied only for adults. The objective of this study was to compare AUC24 values obtained with the Sawchuk-Zaske method and two Bayesian models.

methodsAUC24 values were estimated retrospectively for 18 neonates and infants with steady-state peak and trough concentrations using traditional compartmental analysis with a one-compartment model (reference method), the Sawchuk-Zaske method, and Bayesian forecasting with two previously published models. In Bayesian forecasting, both original and modified residual error models were used. In the modified models, the residual error was reduced by setting the additive residual error to zero and the proportional error to 15%.

resultsAUC24 estimates obtained with the Sawchuk-Zaske method differed - 2.7 to 0.9% from the reference method. When both peak and trough concentrations were used in Bayesian forecasting, 61% and 33% of AUC24 estimates obtained with two original models differed less than 15% from the reference method, and these fractions increased to 83% and 72% with the modified models, respectively.

conclusionWhen practical peak and trough concentrations are measured at steady state, the simple Sawchuk-Zaske method is very useful for AUC24 estimation in neonates and infants. In Bayesian forecasting, the reduced residual error model can be used to improve the model fit.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremVancomycinFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleModels, BiologicalRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39438393
PMCPMC11549144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.