ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2024
Comparison of Vancomycin AUC24 Calculation Methods for Neonates and Infants.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing in Pediatric Patients: Current Software Tools and Bedside Guided Application.Paediatric drugs · 2026Pooled it
- Vancomycin AUCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveFor neonates and infants receiving intermittent vancomycin infusions, the area under the concentration-time curve during 24 h (AUC24) is often estimated with Bayesian forecasting using one or more measured vancomycin concentrations. When practical peak and trough concentrations are measured at steady state, AUC24 can also be calculated with first-order steady-state equations for a one-compartment model (Sawchuk-Zaske method), but previously this method has been applied only for adults. The objective of this study was to compare AUC24 values obtained with the Sawchuk-Zaske method and two Bayesian models.
methodsAUC24 values were estimated retrospectively for 18 neonates and infants with steady-state peak and trough concentrations using traditional compartmental analysis with a one-compartment model (reference method), the Sawchuk-Zaske method, and Bayesian forecasting with two previously published models. In Bayesian forecasting, both original and modified residual error models were used. In the modified models, the residual error was reduced by setting the additive residual error to zero and the proportional error to 15%.
resultsAUC24 estimates obtained with the Sawchuk-Zaske method differed - 2.7 to 0.9% from the reference method. When both peak and trough concentrations were used in Bayesian forecasting, 61% and 33% of AUC24 estimates obtained with two original models differed less than 15% from the reference method, and these fractions increased to 83% and 72% with the modified models, respectively.
conclusionWhen practical peak and trough concentrations are measured at steady state, the simple Sawchuk-Zaske method is very useful for AUC24 estimation in neonates and infants. In Bayesian forecasting, the reduced residual error model can be used to improve the model fit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.