Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438392›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

Efficacy of swallowing rehabilitative therapies for adults with dysphagia: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chi-Li Lee, Kondwani Joseph Banda, Yu-Hao Chu, Doresses Liu, Chiu-Kuei Lee, Chien-Mei Sung, Hidayat Arifin, Kuei-Ru Chou

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chi-Li LeeDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kondwani Joseph BandaSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Yu-Hao ChuSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Doresses LiuSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Chiu-Kuei LeeSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Chien-Mei SungDepartment of Nursing, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hidayat ArifinSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 110, Taiwan.
Kuei-Ru ChouSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei, 110, Taiwan. kueiru@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-4882-3503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysphagia leads to poor swallowing function and high risk of aspiration; swallowing rehabilitative therapies including jaw exercises, tongue exercises, chin tuck against resistance (CTAR), Shaker exercises, effortful swallow training (EST), traditional dysphagia therapy (TDT), and respiratory muscle training (RMT) including inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) and expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) are a crucial part of dysphagia rehabilitation. However, limited evidence exists on the comparative efficacy of swallowing rehabilitative therapies in adults with dysphagia. This is the first network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the comparative efficacy of swallowing rehabilitative therapies for adults with dysphagia. Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PubMed were comprehensively searched until September, 2024. The Frequentist NMA model was performed in R-Software presenting standardized mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for swallowing function and aspiration. Cochrane Q, τ

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersExercise TherapyAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAdultsDysphagiaNetwork meta-analysisSwallowing rehabilitative therapies

Identifiers

PMID39438392
PMCPMC11979051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.