ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2024
Post-operative care for patients following surgical treatment of lymphedema.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Debulking" the future of lymphedema surgery: A narrative review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Surgical Intervention for Filariasis-Induced Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of Ablative and Physiological Approaches.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Epigenetic reprogramming via EZH2 inhibition rescues fibroadipose pathogenesis in secondary lymphedema through activating PPARγ signaling.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- A Prospective Study of the Impact of Lymphatic Venous Anastomosis as a Treatment for Lymphedema.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical treatments are promising for the treatment of lymphedema. It is important for patients, healthcare providers, and lymphedema community to understand that surgical treatments currently are not a cure for lymphedema but have provided promising options for patients. Post-operative care for patients following surgical treatment of lymphedema is vital to optimize and sustain patient outcomes. This expert-consensus statement addresses current practice and research needs for standardized post-operative care, a core set of outcome measures, quality of care, and training of healthcare providers. Current research and clinical practice support non-surgical lymphedema therapy, also known as conservative therapy of lymphedema (e.g., compression therapy, or manual lymph drainage, or Complete Decongestive Therapy) as an essential part of post-operative care. Importantly, patient education should focus on patients' understanding that surgery is not a cure and the importance to adhere to post-operative care and life-long self-monitoring to sustain surgical results of limb volume reduction, relief of symptoms, and mitigate known or ongoing risk factors for recurrence of lymphedema. To optimize patient outcomes, it is crucial to have a multidisciplinary professional team consisting of well-qualified and credentialed healthcare providers participating in ongoing training and education. The essentials recommended by this expert-consensus are an initial and foundational step to build clinical standards for best practice and provide directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39438388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.