ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Venous thromboembolism and ovarian cancer risk: a Mendelian randomized study.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: The State of the Research.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA potential link between venous thromboembolism and the risk of ovarian cancer has been identified in clinical practice. However, it is unclear whether there is a causal relationship between the two. In this study, we applied a univariate two-sample Mendelian randomization method to explain the possible link between venous thromboembolism and ovarian cancer pathogenesis at the genetic level, and pointed out that lipid metabolism and ovarian cancer pathogenesis have innovative basic experimental directions.
objectiveThis study explored the causal effect between a history of venous thromboembolism and the risk of ovarian cancer.
methodsGenome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data of venous thromboembolism patients (n = 9176) of the same ethnicity were selected as study exposures, and GWAS data of ovarian cancer patients (n = 1218) of the same ethnicity were selected as study exposures. In this study, univariate two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (UVMR) was performed separately using inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and weighted median (WM) to assess causal effects. In this study, Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger regression intercept term, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out method were used for sensitivity analysis to assess the stability and reliability of the results.
resultsThe GWAS data screened in this study were all European ethnicity data. In this study, we found that genetically predicted history of venous thromboembolism was associated with an upward trend in ovarian cancer incidence, and the results of Weighted median, Simple mode, Weighted mode, and MR Egger showed a similar trend (OR = 1.0006, 95% CI: 1.00007-1.0013, p < 0.05). There was no heterogeneity of results (p = 0.18) and no horizontal pleiotropy (p = 0.77). The instrumental variables selected for venous thromboembolism in this study were all strong instrumental variables (F = 669.7). The results of the sensitivity analysis remained consistent.
conclusionThe results of this study indicate that patients with a history of venous thromboembolism are at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer and point to possible associations between lipid metabolism genes, such as CYP4V2, and the development of ovarian cancer, which provide interesting directions for further basic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.