ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Rapid identification of antibiotic residues in bovine kidney using coated blade spray-mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid and Green Extraction of Food Contaminants: Integrating Advanced Porous Materials and Miniaturized Functional Platforms for Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Analysis.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Bacterial biomineralization-engineered Ag-Pt nanozyme for label-free and sensitive colorimetric detection of enrofloxacin in aquatic products.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Exploring Metal-Organic Framework-Coated Blades for Direct and High-Throughput Screening Analysis of Complex Biological Matrices.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Combining electroless ionisation mass spectrometry with solid-phase extraction for the direct analysis of beta-agonists in bovine urine.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Direct Ambient Mass Spectrometry for Food, Beverage, and Agricultural Sample Analysis and Research.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of certain antibiotics in food-producing animals is allowed in Europe following Regulation (EU) 2017/625. However, use could result in antibiotic residues in foodstuffs of animal origin. Maximum residue limits (MRLs) are in place to protect consumers. For monitoring purposes, animal matrices are tested to verify their compliance with these MRLs. Initially, matrices of (slaughtered) food animals are screened, often using a microbiological assay. Faster screening tests for antibiotics would be an advantage for control laboratories. Therefore, the present study describes, for the first time, the use of coated blade spray (CBS) followed by direct mass spectrometry (MS) analysis for the screening of tetracyclines, sulfonamides, quinolones, and macrolides residues from the renal area of intact bovine kidneys. An optimized workflow using two different desorption/ionization solutions per blade allowed screening of target compounds within 1 min per sample. The proof-of-principle of the CBS-MS method is validated according to (EU) 2021/808, presenting CCβ screening values of 0.1 × MRL for 43 analytes, 0.5 × MRL for 4 analytes, and 2.5 µg kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.