ArticleHeart and vessels2025
Impact of irrigation flow rates on lesion size and safety of ablation catheters: an ex vivo porcine heart study.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is a well-established therapeutic approach for treating arrhythmias, where lesion size and safety are critical for efficacy. This study explored the impact of varying irrigation flow rates on lesion characteristics using the TactiFlex™ SE Ablation Catheter (TF) in an ex vivo porcine heart model, focusing on the size and safety outcomes associated with low versus standard flow rates. Myocardial slabs from porcine hearts were subjected to ablation using two types of irrigated catheters. Lesion formation was compared between low (8 mL/min for TF) and standard irrigation flow rates (13 mL/min for TF) across different power settings (30, 40, and 50 W). Outcome measures included lesion dimensions, incidence of steam pops, and impedance drops. A total of 210 lesions were generated under various settings. At low flow rates, the TF catheter safely formed larger lesions compared to the standard flow rates without a significant increase in steam pops or impedance drops. Lesions at low flow rates were comparable in size to those formed using other catheters under the standard settings. Conversely, the standard flow settings for TF produced smaller lesions but exhibited higher safety profiles, as evidenced by fewer steam pops and impedance drops. Lower irrigation flow rates using a TF catheter can achieve larger lesions without compromising safety, offering an optimization strategy for RF ablation procedures that balances efficacy and safety. These findings may guide clinicians in tailoring ablation strategies according to individual patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39438335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.