Trial reportJournal of sleep research2025
Treating narcolepsy-related nightmares with cognitive behavioural therapy and targeted lucidity reactivation: A pilot study.
Trial report in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treating narcolepsy-related nightmares with cognitive behavioural therapy and targeted lucidity reactivation: A pilot study.Journal of sleep research · 2025Trial
- Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Current and Emerging Treatments for Narcolepsy Type 1.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Investigating dreams by strategically presenting sounds during REM sleep to reactivate waking experiences.Neuropsychologia · 2025Article
- The Future of Parasomnias.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nightmares are a common symptom in narcolepsy that has not been targeted in prior clinical trials. This study investigated the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Nightmares (CBT-N), adapted for narcolepsy, in a small group of adults. Given the high prevalence of lucid dreaming in narcolepsy, we added a promising adjuvant component, targeted lucidity reactivation (TLR), a procedure designed to enhance lucid dreaming and dream control. Using a multiple baseline single-case experimental design, adults with narcolepsy and frequent nightmares (≥3/week, N = 6) were randomised to a 2 or 4 week baseline and received seven treatment sessions (CBT-N or CBT-N + TLR). Across the groups, there was a large effect size (between-case standardised mean difference [BC-SMD] = -0.97, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.14, p < 0.05) for reduced nightmare frequency from baseline (M = 8.38/week, SD = 7.08) to posttreatment (M = 2.25/week, SD = 1.78). Nightmare severity improved significantly with large effect sizes on sleep diaries (BC-SMD = -1.14, 95% CI -2.03 to -0.25, p < 0.05) and the Disturbing Dream and Nightmare Severity Index (z = -2.20, p = 0.03, r = -0.64). Treatment was associated with a reduction for some participants in sleep paralysis, sleep-related hallucinations, and dream enactment. NREM parasomnia symptoms (z = -2.20, p = 0.03, r = -0.64) and self-efficacy for managing symptoms (z = -2.02, p = 0.04, r = -0.58) improved significantly with large effect sizes. Participants who underwent TLR (n = 3) all recalled dreams pertaining to their rescripted nightmare. In interviews, participants noted reduced shame and anxiety about sleep/nightmares. This study provides a proof of concept for the application of TLR as a therapeutic strategy with clinical populations, as well as preliminary evidence for the efficacy of CBT-N in treating narcolepsy-related nightmares.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.