Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438105›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effectiveness of a supervised group-based walking program on physical, psychological and social outcomes among older adults: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Ka Man Leung, Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, Kailing Ou, Pak Kwong Chung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05907252 (The Effectiveness of Supervised Group-based Walking Program on Physical, Psychological and Social Outcomes Among Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05907252 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Effectiveness of Supervised Group-based Walking Program on Physical, Psychological and Social Outcomes Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEducation University of Hong KongRan2023 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsPhysical Inactivity, Social InteractionArmsSupervised Group-based Intervention, Non-supervised Group-based Intervention, Non-supervised Individual-based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming Yu Claudia WongDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China cmywong@eduhk.hk.
Ka Man LeungDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Cecilie Thøgersen-NtoumaniCurtin University Perth, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Kailing OuDepartment of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Pak Kwong ChungDepartment of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo minimise adverse health events among older adults, physical activity (PA) is considered one of the most fundamental and effective forms of lifestyle. Therefore, an urgent effort to promote a physically active lifestyle among our older adults is needed, in which walking could be a better choice, especially for mass promotion. Besides, the types of PA interventions were also shown to affect their effectiveness on older adults' psychosocial outcomes. Hence, the overall aim of the project is to examine the effectiveness of supervised group-based walking intervention by comparing it with unsupervised group-based walking and unsupervised individual-based walking interventions on improving physical, psychological and social outcomes among older adults in Hong Kong. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research will conduct a four-group (supervised group-based, unsupervised group-based walking, unsupervised individual-based, control group), double-blind, randomised control trial, targeting 184 older adults in Hong Kong. The primary outcomes will be measured by participants' changes in resting heart rates, body compositions, resting blood pressures, walking performance, loneliness, perceived social support and PA enjoyment. The results will be analysed using repeated analysis of variance and one-way analysis of covariance, as well as by conducting in-depth interviews with selected participants. Also, the outcomes of the research will be used as references for designing an effective walking operation manual for promoting healthy ageing among older adults in the community. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The current study involves human participants, and the research protocol has been approved by the research ethics committee at Hong Kong Baptist University (Ref: R2022-2023-0013). All participants will be provided with written informed consent to participate. The outcomes of the intervention protocol will be disseminated through manuscript publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Trial ID: NCT05907252; date of first posted: 16 June 2023).

Indexed as

Health PromotionOrganization and AdministrationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial SupportWalkingAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHong KongHumansLonelinessMaleAgedHealthHealth Services for the Aged

Identifiers

PMID39438105
PMCPMC11499851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.