ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
DeepCheck: multitask learning aids in assessing microbial genome quality.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the cancer microbiome: multi-omics, AI, and translational opportunities.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of metagenome binning: advances and challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metagenomic analyses facilitate the exploration of the microbial world, advancing our understanding of microbial roles in ecological and biological processes. A pivotal aspect of metagenomic analysis involves assessing the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), crucial for accurate biological insights. Current machine learning-based methods often treat completeness and contamination prediction as separate tasks, overlooking their inherent relationship and limiting models' generalization. In this study, we present DeepCheck, a multitasking deep learning framework for simultaneous prediction of MAG completeness and contamination. DeepCheck consistently outperforms existing tools in accuracy across various experimental settings and demonstrates comparable speed while maintaining high predictive accuracy even for new lineages. Additionally, we employ interpretable machine learning techniques to identify specific genes and pathways that drive the model's predictions, enabling independent investigation and assessment of these biological elements for deeper insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.