Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438066›Full record

ArticleRespiratory care2024

Long-Term Disabilities in ICU Survivors of COVID-19.

Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Dimas Cavalheiro Prazeres, Silvia Gaspar, Felipe Granado de Souza, Luciana D Chiavegato, Camila Ferreira Leite, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Carlos Rr Carvalho, Marcia S Volpe

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karina Ramiceli Soares da SilvaDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dimas Cavalheiro PrazeresDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Silvia GasparServiço de Fisioterapia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Granado de SouzaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana D ChiavegatoDisciplina de Pneumologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; and Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Ferreira LeitePrograma de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia e Funcionalidade, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Shamyr Sulyvan de CastroPrograma de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia e Funcionalidade, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Carlos Rr CarvalhoDivisão de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcia S VolpeDepartamento de Ciências do Movimento Humano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil. marcia.volpe@unifesp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is associated with prolonged disability, particularly after critical illness. This study aimed to assess and compare disability post-hospital discharge of subjects who were invasively ventilated versus those who were not, following ICU admission due to COVID-19. This study also explored variables associated with long-term disability.

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, subjects with COVID-19 who received invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula during ICU stay were assessed with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 at 3 and 6 months post-hospital discharge. Data were analyzed collectively and stratified as subjects with and without invasive mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance and multiple regression analyses were applied.

resultsThe subjects (

conclusionsDisability persisted at 6 month post-hospital discharge for ICU survivors of COVID-19, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Participation was the only domain that showed higher disability among those who received invasive ventilation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disability EvaluationIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialSurvivorsAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePersons with DisabilitiesProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2disabilityintensive carelong-term outcomesmechanical ventilationpost–COVID-19 condition

Identifiers

PMID39438066
PMCPMC11573000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.