Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39437833›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2025

Slow dissociation kinetics of fentanyls and nitazenes correlates with reduced sensitivity to naloxone reversal at the μ-opioid receptor.

Norah Alhosan, Damiana Cavallo, Marina Santiago, Eamonn Kelly, Graeme Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norah AlhosanSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7545-0263
Damiana CavalloSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marina SantiagoMacquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Eamonn KellySchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-3993
Graeme HendersonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-0048

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/ S010890/1Medical Research Council MR/S010890/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFentanyls and nitazenes are μ-opioid receptor agonists responsible for a large number of opioid overdose deaths. Here, we determined the potency, dissociation kinetics and antagonism by naloxone at the μ receptor of several fentanyl and nitazene analogues, compared to morphine and DAMGO. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In vitro assays of G protein activation and signalling and arrestin recruitment were performed. AtT20 cells expressing μ receptors were loaded with a membrane potential dye and changes in fluorescence used to determine agonist potency, dissociation kinetics and susceptibility to antagonism by naloxone. BRET experiments were undertaken in HEK293T cells expressing μ receptors to assess Gi protein activation and β-arrestin 2 recruitment. KEY

resultsThe apparent rate of agonist dissociation from the μ receptor varied: morphine, DAMGO, alfentanil and fentanyl dissociated rapidly, whereas isotonitazene, etonitazene, ohmefentanyl and carfentanil dissociated slowly. Slowly dissociating agonists were more resistant to antagonism by naloxone. For carfentanil, the slow apparent rate of dissociation was not because of G protein receptor kinase-mediated arrestin recruitment as its apparent rate of dissociation was not increased by inhibition of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) with Compound 101. The in vitro relative potencies of fentanyls and nitazenes compared to morphine were much lower than that previously observed in in vivo experiments. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: With fentanyls and nitazenes that slowly dissociate from the μ receptor, antagonism by naloxone is pseudo-competitive. In overdoses involving fentanyls and nitazenes, higher doses of naloxone may be required for reversal than those normally used to reverse heroin overdose.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidFentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muAnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansKineticsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, mucompetitive antagonismfentanylnaloxonenitazeneopioidμ‐opioid receptor

Identifiers

PMID39437833
PMCPMC7618119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.