Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39437804›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2024

Pathological response following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a cross-trial, patient-level analysis.

Antonio D'Alessio, Bernardo Stefanini, Julia Blanter, Benjamin Adegbite, Fionnuala Crowley, Vincent Yip, Sarah Slater, Claudia Angela Maria Fulgenzi, Ciro Celsa, Giulia Francesca Manfredi and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Updated pan-tumor guidelines for neoadjuvant scoring of pathologic response: a joint SITC and INMC effort.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic Value of Pathological Response After Conversion Therapy and Salvage Surgery in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  19. Reinvigorating COTL1Nature cell biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Antonio D'AlessioDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Bernardo StefaniniDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Julia BlanterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin AdegbiteDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Fionnuala CrowleyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Vincent YipBarts and The London HPB Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sarah SlaterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Claudia Angela Maria FulgenziDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ciro CelsaDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Health Promotion, Mother & Child Care, Internal Medicine & Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giulia Francesca ManfrediDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy.
Madhava PaiDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Robert D GoldinDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Stephen C WardDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Maria Isabel FielDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel H ShuSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yung-Yeh SuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Alessio CortelliniDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Operative Research Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, and Department of Medicine and Surgery, Universitá Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Marina BarettiSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert AndersSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark YarchoanSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chiun HsuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Thomas U MarronDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
David J PinatoDivision of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy. Electronic address: david.pinato@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Platform Study Reveals Mechanisms of Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)R01CA285544 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Won Jin Ho, Mark Yarchoan · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA285544Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before liver resection results in pathological tumour regression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to describe the characteristics of pathological responses after preoperative ICI therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and to evaluate the association between the depth of tumour regression and relapse-free survival.

methodsIn this cross-trial, patient-level analysis, we performed a pooled analysis of data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving ICI therapy before liver resection as part of a global collaborative consortium (NeoHCC) of five phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and standardised observational protocols conducted in 12 tertiary referral centres across the USA, UK, and Taiwan. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by tissue core biopsy before treatment initiation, a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System score of 5 on imaging, or both, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and no extrahepatic spread or previous ICI treatment. Pathological response was measured as the percentage of non-viable tumour in the resected surgical specimen, with major pathological response corresponding to at least 70% tumour regression and pathological complete response corresponding to 100% tumour regression. We correlated pathological response with radiological overall response using RECIST criteria (version 1.1) and relapse-free survival, and evaluated the threshold of tumour regression that could be optimally associated with relapse-free survival.

findingsAt data cutoff on Jan 31, 2024, 111 patients were included in the study, of whom data on pathological response were available for 104 (94%) patients. Patients received treatment from Oct 5, 2017, to Nov 15, 2023, mostly ICI combinations (76 [69%]), for a median of 1·4 months (IQR 0·7-2·9). 87 (78%) patients were men and 24 (22%) were women. Most patients had underlying viral chronic liver disease (73 [66%]) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (61 [55%]), without portal vein thrombosis (87 [78%]). We observed major pathological response in 33 (32%) patients and pathological complete response in 19 (18%) patients. Radiological overall response was associated with major pathological response, with 23 (74%) of 31 patients with radiological response showing major pathological response compared with ten (14%) of 73 patients without radiological response (p<0·0001). However, ten (30%) of 33 major pathological responses were not predicted by radiological response. After a median follow-up of 27·2 months (95% CI 22·3-32·1), median relapse-free survival for the whole cohort was 43·6 months (95% CI 28·3-not evaluable). Relapse-free survival was significantly longer in patients with major pathological response than in those who did not have a major pathological response (not reached [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 28·3 months [12·8-43·8]; hazard ratio 0·26 [0·10-0·66]; p=0·0024) and in patients with pathological complete response than in those who did not have a pathological complete response (NR [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 32·8 months [15·0-50·5]; 0·19 [0·05-0·78]; p=0·010). Unbiased recursive partitioning of the cohort for the risk of relapse, death, or both identified a threshold of 90% as the optimal cutoff of pathological tumour regression to predict improved relapse-free survival.

interpretationThe extent of tumour regression following neoadjuvant ICI therapy could identify patients with improved relapse-free survival following liver resection. The threshold of at least 90% tumour regression should be validated for its surrogate role for relapse-free survival in phase 3 randomised controlled trials.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHepatectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39437804
PMCPMC12040480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.