ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024
Seeing with an extra sense.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The allostery principle supports the symbolic character of signaling circuits: gene regulation provides a form of intelligence to living systems.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2026Article
- Phenomenological model of transthyretin stabilization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Science foremost derives from our curiosity about the world. Can we make sense of the phenomena we see around us? Given that understanding, can we predict previously unimagined phenomena? How do things work? Can we use what we discover to invent new technologies? One class of questions that has mesmerized observers, dating at least to early cave paintings of hunters and their prey, surrounds the nature of the phenomenon we refer to as life. Over the centuries, scientists have found a broad array of surprisingly different techniques for observing, measuring, characterizing and explaining the living world. Microscopes provide a dazzling view of a previously unseen reality that tells us how living organisms are made up and how their components are organized and move. The tools of molecular science tell us the sequence and structure of the macromolecules that fill cells. The data explosion that has attended the development of a new generation of high-throughput tools for querying the living world demands that we have some way of accounting for those data that both provide intuition and make dangerous predictions with no after-the-fact parametric wiggle room. In this special issue of Current Biology, leading researchers explore how physical approaches have contributed to various fields of biology. Here, to introduce this special issue, I consider some of the ways in which viewing the living through a physical lens allows us to see things that might otherwise remain hidden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.