Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39437381›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Facilitators of and Barriers to Teachers' Engagement With Consumer Technologies for Stress Management: Qualitative Study.

Julia B Manning, Ann Blandford, Julian Edbrooke-Childs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia B ManningUCL Interaction Centre, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-5215
Ann BlandfordUCL Institute of Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3198-7122
Julian Edbrooke-ChildsEvidence-based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-4058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer technology is increasingly being adopted to support personal stress management, including by teachers. Multidisciplinary research has contributed some knowledge of design and features that can help detect and manage workplace stress. However, there is less understanding of what facilitates engagement with ubiquitous "off the shelf" technologies, particularly in a specific occupational setting. An understanding of features that facilitate or inhibit technology use, and the influences of contexts on the manner of interaction, could improve teachers' stress-management opportunities.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate the interaction features that facilitated or inhibited engagement with 4 consumer technologies chosen by teachers for stress management, as well as the influence of the educational contexts on their engagement. We also examined how use of well-being technology could be better supported in the school.

methodsThe choice of consumer technologies was categorized in a taxonomy for English secondary school teachers according to stress-management strategies and digital features. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we adapted the study so that working from home in the summer could be contrasted with being back in school. Thus, a longitudinal study intended for 6 weeks in the summer term (in 2020) was extended into the autumn term, lasting up to 27 weeks. Teachers chose to use either a Withings smartwatch or Wysa, Daylio, or Teacher Tapp apps. Two semistructured interviews and web-based surveys were conducted with 8 teachers in England in the summer term, and 6 (75%) of them took part in a third interview in the autumn term. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by interpretive phenomenological analysis.

resultsTechnology elements and characteristics such as passive data collation, brevity of interaction, discreet appearance, reminders, and data visualization were described by teachers as facilitators. Lack of instructions and information on features, connectivity, extended interaction requirements, and nondifferentiation of activity and exercise data were described as barriers. Mesocontextual barriers to engagement were also reported, particularly when teachers were back on school premises, including temporal constraints, social stigma, and lack of private space to de-stress. Teachers had ideas for feature improvements and how educational leadership normalizing teachers' stress management with consumer technologies could benefit the school culture.

conclusionsHaving preselected their stress-management strategies, teachers were able to harness design features to support themselves over an extended period. There could be an important role for digital interventions as part of teachers' stress management, which the school leadership would need to leverage to maximize their potential. The findings add to the holistic understanding of situated self-care and should inform developers' considerations for occupational digital stress support.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchSchool TeachersAdultCOVID-19FemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational StressStress, Psychologicalappscontextdigital healthHCIhigh schoolshuman-computer interactionpersonal informaticsqualitativeself-managementstressteacherstechnologywearablesworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39437381
PMCPMC11538882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.