ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025
Evolution of left ventricular thrombus on serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A simplified geometric CMR method for reproducible quantification of left ventricular thrombus volume : Left Ventricular thrombus: a standardized measurement method.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Trial
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Factors Associated With Left Ventricular Thrombus Recurrence.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Evolving Strategies in the Detection and Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Clinical Summary.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCurrent management of left ventricular (LV) thrombus relies on limited, non-contemporary, echocardiography-based studies. Data on LV thrombus evolution and the associated embolic risk are scarce. We aimed to describe the evolution of LV thrombus on serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-the current reference standard for the detection of LV thrombus-and identify correlates of no resolution and the embolic risk associated with resolution status. METHODS AND
resultsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 107 consecutive patients with LV thrombus who had 213 serial CMRs at a median of 255 days after the index CMR. Of these, 97.2% were anticoagulated. At 3 months after detection by CMR, 75% (47/63) had no resolution of LV thrombus; at 6 months, 53% (35/66) had no resolution; and at 12 months, 37% (23/63) had no resolution. Correlates of no resolution at 6 months included a history of myocardial infarction, LV aneurysm, ischaemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy, and larger thrombus volume. Recurrence of LV thrombus was rare at 5.3%. On survival analysis using the landmark analysis method, embolic events often occurred beyond 6 months, more frequently in patients with unresolved LV thrombus.
conclusionOur findings challenge previous literature by demonstrating a lower rate of resolution of LV thrombus and substantial embolic risk beyond 6 months associated with unresolved LV thrombus on serial CMR. Our findings advocate for extended anticoagulation, particularly in patients with markers associated with no resolution. These findings have important implications for clinical practice and research into managing patients with LV thrombus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.