ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2024
An Efficient Framework for Personalizing EMG-Driven Musculoskeletal Models Based on Reinforcement Learning.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spike train analysis in rehabilitation movement classification using deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emerging Frontiers in Robotic Upper-Limb Prostheses: Mechanisms, Materials, Tactile Sensors and Machine Learning-Based EMG Control: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a novel framework to quickly personalize electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal models (MMs) as efferent neural interfaces for upper limb prostheses. Our framework adopts a generic upper-limb MM as a baseline and uses an artificial neural network-based policy to fine-tune the model parameters for MM personalization. The policy was trained by reinforcement learning (RL) to heuristically adjust the MM parameters to maximize the accuracy of estimated hand and wrist motions from EMG inputs. Our present framework was compared to the baseline MM and a widely used MM parameter optimization method: simulated annealing (SA). An offline evaluation was performed to first quantify the time required for MM personalization and the kinematics estimation accuracy of personalized MMs based on data collected from non-disabled subjects. Then, in an online evaluation, additional human subjects, including an individual with a transradial amputation, performed a virtual hand posture matching task using generic and personalized MMs. Results showed that compared to the baseline generic MM, personalized MMs estimated joint motion with lower error in both offline ( ) and online tests ( ), demonstrating the benefit of MM personalization. The RL-based framework performed model optimization in under one second on average in cases that took SA over 13 minutes and yielded comparable kinematics estimations both offline and online. Hence, our present personalization framework can be a practical solution for the daily use of EMG-driven MMs in prostheses or other assistive devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.