Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39437171›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2024

A novel gene editing lexicon strategy for the haemophilia community: Research plan for development and preliminary results.

Cedric Hermans, Leonard A Valentino, Courtney D Thornburg, Carmen Unzu, Mark A Kay, Flora Peyvandi, Penni Smith, Wolfgang Miesbach, William McKeown, Glenn F Pierce and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Bleeding Disorders Research Collaborative.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025
    Review
  3. Clinical perspective: Advancing hemophilia treatment through gene therapy approaches.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Development of a novel gene editing lexicon for hemophilia: methodology and results.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cedric HermansCliniques universitaires saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLOuvain), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-8437
Leonard A ValentinoNational Bleeding Disorders Foundation, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7927-6418
Courtney D ThornburgDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Carmen UnzuDNA&RNA Medicine Division, CIMA-Universidad de Navarra, IdisNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Mark A KayPediatrics - Human Gene Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Flora PeyvandiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-9864
Penni SmithUtah Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Wolfgang MiesbachDepartment of Haemostaseology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-0061
William McKeownCare of Elderly Medicine, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, Northern Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1916-041X
Glenn F PierceWorld Federation of Hemophilia, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-328X
Kate KhairHaemnet, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-5958
Steven W PipePediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2558-2089
Katarina StarcevicLanguage Strategy, Maslansky and Partners, New York City, New York, USA.
Monisha PillaiLanguage Strategy, Maslansky and Partners, New York City, New York, USA.
Micheala JonesRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Megan ChiaoRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Ilia AntoninoIntellia Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Craig KesslerMedicine and Pathology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-5724

Funding

Intellia Therapeutics, IncRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the progress in gene editing platforms like CRISPR/Cas9 with the potential to transform the standard of care for haemophilia, the language used to explain and discuss gene editing is not aligned across the haemophilia community. Here, we present the objective and rationale for developing a clear, consistent, and globally aligned gene editing lexicon to address these communication gaps.

methodsEffectively communicating complex gene editing concepts requires a clear and consistent vocabulary. Through collaboration with a diversity of haemophilia stakeholders, our main goal is to develop an accurate, informative lexicon which avoids overpromising or highly technical terminology. Using an innovative process, representatives from several patient and scientific haemophilia organizations and select biotechnology companies will develop and refine language concepts to be tested with approximately seventy participants across the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Germany. Participants will include lived experience experts (LEEs) and haematologists. The process will be overseen by the Lexicon Steering Committee of global experts from leading scientific and patient organizations in the haemophilia and gene editing fields.

resultsInitial feedback provided a robust foundation and rationale for building clear, consistent language around gene editing. This lexicon development framework will allow for increased understanding across the haemophilia community, including the development of valid informed consent and shared decision-making materials.

conclusionResults provide important building blocks for stimuli development and highlight the need for a novel gene editing lexicon. In the next phase, language stimuli will be tested with LEEs and haematologists to better understand audience preferences and help shape the final lexicon.

Indexed as

Gene EditingHemophilia AHumansblood coagulation disordersCRISPRgene editinghaemophilialexicon

Identifiers

PMID39437171
PMCPMC11659488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.