Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436968›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2025

Fragment and torsion biasing algorithms for construction of small organic molecules in proteins using DOCK.

John D Bickel, Brock T Boysan, Robert C Rizzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DOCKweb: a web-based GUI platform for molecular modeling with DOCK6.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John D BickelDepartment of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.
Brock T BoysanDepartment of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.
Robert C RizzoDepartment of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-6147

Funding

Development, Validation, and Application of Structure-based Tools for Computational Molecular DesignR35GM126906 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ROBERT C. RIZZO · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Chemical Biology Training InterfaceT32GM136572 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ELIZABETH M BOON, Jessica Chuang Seeliger · 2020 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126906NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136572NIH HHS R35GM126906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computational construction of small organic molecules (de novo design), directly in a protein binding site, is an effective means for generating novel ligands tailored to fit the pocket environment. In this work, we present two new methods, which aim to improve de novo design outcomes using (1) biasing algorithms to prioritize selection and/or acceptance of fragments and torsions during growth, and (2) parallel-based clustering and pruning algorithms to remove duplicate molecules as candidate fragment are added. Large-scale testing encompassing thousands of simulations were employed to interrogate the methods in terms of multiple metrics which include numbers of duplicate molecules generated, pairwise-similarity, focused library reconstruction rates, fragment and torsion frequencies, fragment and torsion rank scores, interaction energy and drug-likeness scores, and 3D pose comparisons. The biasing algorithms, particularly those that include fragment and torsion components simultaneously, led to molecules that more closely mimicked the distributions of fragments and torsions found in drug-like libraries. The new parallel-based clustering and pruning algorithms, compared with the existing serial approach, also led to larger ensembles comprised of topologically unique molecules with much greater efficiency by removing redundant growth paths.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesBinding SitesDrug DesignLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationOrganic ChemicalsLigandsOrganic ChemicalsProteinsSmall Molecule Librariesbiasingchemical spacede novo designDOCKDOCK6drug discoveryfragment librariesstructure‐based design

Identifiers

PMID39436968
PMCPMC11588537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.