Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436926›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

REIV-TOXO Project: Results from a Spanish cohort of congenital toxoplasmosis (2015-2022). The beneficial effects of prenatal treatment on clinical outcomes of infected newborns.

Borja Guarch-Ibáñez, Clara Carreras-Abad, Marie Antoinette Frick, Daniel Blázquez-Gamero, Fernando Baquero-Artigao, Isabel Fuentes, Spanish Research Network of Congenital Toxoplasmosis (REIV-TOXO) group, Pere Soler-Palacin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Borja Guarch-IbáñezPediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-0191
Clara Carreras-AbadCongenital Infections Working Group, Spanish Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP), Spain.
Marie Antoinette FrickCongenital Infections Working Group, Spanish Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP), Spain.
Daniel Blázquez-GameroCongenital Infections Working Group, Spanish Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP), Spain.
Fernando Baquero-ArtigaoCongenital Infections Working Group, Spanish Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (SEIP), Spain.
Isabel FuentesToxoplasmosis and Intestinal Protozoa Unit, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Spanish Research Network of Congenital Toxoplasmosis (REIV-TOXO) group
Pere Soler-PalacinPediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Hospital Infantil Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome regions of Spain are withdrawing their pregnancy screening program for congenital toxoplasmosis (CT). The Spanish Research Network of Congenital Toxoplasmosis (REIV-TOXO) was created to describe the current status of CT in Spain. The aims of this study were to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of CT and to evaluate the effect of prenatal treatment on clinical outcomes to inform decision-making policies.

methodsAmbispective observational study including CT cases recorded in the REIV-TOXO database that includes 122 hospitals (2015-2022). Inclusion criteria were one or more of the following: positive PCR in maternal amniotic fluid; positive Toxoplasma gondii-specific IgM or IgA antibodies at birth; positive PCR in the placenta, newborn blood, urine or CSF; increase of specific IgG levels during infant follow-up; or specific IgG persistence beyond age 12 months.

findingsFifty-six newborns (54 pregnancies) were included. Prenatal screening allowed 92.8% of cases to be identified. The time of maternal infection was well documented in 90.7% of cases, with 61.1% occurring in the third trimester. A total of 66.6% (36/54) pregnant women received antiparasitic treatment: 24/36 spiramycin, 8/36 pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and folinic acid, and 4/36 both treatments sequentially. Most cases were asymptomatic at birth (62.5%, 35/56), and 84% (47/56) newborns completed one year of treatment. Median follow-up was 24 months (IQR = 3-72): 14.2% children exhibited new complications, mainly ocular. Newborns born to mothers treated prenatally had four-fold lower risk of CT clinical features at birth (p = 0.03) and six-fold lower risk of further complications during follow-up (p = 0.04) with no treatment-related differences during pregnancy.

conclusionsWhile diagnosis based only on neonatal assessment misses a significant number of CT cases, prenatal screening allows treatment to be started during pregnancy, with better clinical outcomes at birth and during follow-up. REIV-TOXO provides valuable information about CT in Spain, highlighting the need for universal maternal screening.

Indexed as

Toxoplasmosis, CongenitalAdultAntibodies, ProtozoanAntiprotozoal AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisPyrimethamineSpainAntibodies, ProtozoanAntiprotozoal AgentsImmunoglobulin GPyrimethamine

Identifiers

PMID39436926
PMCPMC11530059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.