Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436883›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Environmental associations of Ophidiomyces ophidiicola, the causative agent of ophidiomycosis in snakes.

Nicholas Friedeman, Evin Carter, Bruce A Kingsbury, Michael J Ravesi, Jillian M Josimovich, Monica Matthews, Mark A Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ophidiomycosis Prevalence and Disease Ecology in a Natrix tessellata (Laurenti, 1768) Population From Northern Italy.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Nationwide Screening Unveils EndemicJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas FriedemanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0003-5533-4243
Evin CarterEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-578X
Bruce A KingsburyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States of America.
Michael J RavesiWildlife Division, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Jillian M JosimovichAvon Park Air Force Range, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Avon Park, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7523-3496
Monica MatthewsSanta Barbata County Fire Safe Council, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Mark A JordanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging pathogenic fungi have become a topic of conservation concern due to declines observed in several host taxa. One emerging fungal pathogen, Ophidiomyces ophidiicola, is well documented as the causative agent of ophidiomycosis, otherwise known as snake fungal disease (SFD). O. ophidiicola has been found to cause disease in a variety of snake species across the United States, including the eastern massasauga (Sistrurus catenatus), a federally threatened rattlesnake species. Most work to date has involved detecting O. ophidiicola for diagnosis of infection through direct sampling of snakes, and attempts to detect O. ophidiicola in the abiotic environment to better understand its distribution, seasonality, and habitat associations are lacking. We collected topsoil and groundwater samples from four macrohabitat types across multiple seasons in northern Michigan at a site where Ophidiomyces infection has been confirmed in eastern massasauga. Using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay developed for O. ophidiicola, we detected Ophidiomyces DNA in topsoil but observed minimal to no detection in groundwater samples. Detection frequency did not differ between habitats, but samples grouped seasonally showed higher detection during mid-summer. We found no relationships of detection with hypothesized environmental correlates such as soil pH, temperature, or moisture content. Furthermore, the distribution of Ophidiomyces positive samples across the site was not linked to estimated space use of massasaugas. Our data suggests that season has some effect on the presence of Ophidiomyces. Differences in presence between habitats may exist but are likely more dependent on the time of sampling and currently uninvestigated soil or biotic parameters. These findings build on our understanding of Ophidiomyces ecology and epidemiology to help inform where and when snakes may be exposed to the fungus in the environment.

Indexed as

OnygenalesAnimalsEcosystemMycosesSeasonsSnakesSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID39436883
PMCPMC11495611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.