Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436758›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Exploration of Chemical Space Through Automated Reasoning.

Judith Clymo, Christopher M Collins, Katie Atkinson, Matthew S Dyer, Michael W Gaultois, Vladimir V Gusev, Matthew J Rosseinsky, Sven Schewe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploration of Chemical Space Through Automated Reasoning.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  3. Chemical space as a unifying theme for chemistry.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Judith ClymoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.
Christopher M CollinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-4426
Katie AtkinsonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-4106
Matthew S DyerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-3003
Michael W GaultoisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2172-2507
Vladimir V GusevDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-607X
Matthew J RosseinskyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-2483
Sven ScheweDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Ashton Building, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-9518

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V026887Leverhulme Trust RC-2015-036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast size of composition space poses a significant challenge for materials chemistry: exhaustive enumeration of potentially interesting compositions is typically infeasible, hindering assessment of important criteria ranging from novelty and stability to cost and performance. We report a tool, Comgen, for the efficient exploration of composition space, which makes use of logical methods from computer science used for proving theorems. We demonstrate how these techniques, which have not previously been applied to materials discovery, can enable reasoning about scientific domain knowledge provided by human experts. Comgen accepts a variety of user-specified criteria, converts these into an abstract form, and utilises a powerful automated reasoning algorithm to identify compositions that satisfy these user requirements, or prove that the requirements cannot be simultaneously satisfied. In contrast to machine learning techniques, explicitly reasoning about domain knowledge, rather than making inferences from data, ensures that Comgen's outputs are fully interpretable and provably correct. Users interact with Comgen through a high-level Python interface. We illustrate use of the tool with several case studies focused on the search for new ionic conductors. Further, we demonstrate the integration of Comgen into an end-to-end automated workflow to propose and evaluate candidate compositions quantitatively, prior to experimental investigation. This highlights the potential of automated formal reasoning in materials chemistry.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceautomated reasoningexplainable modelsmaterials chemistrymaterials discovery

Identifiers

PMID39436758
PMCPMC11795740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.