ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Moving Toward Metaproteogenomics: A Computational Perspective on Analyzing Microbial Samples via Proteogenomics.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Oral Cavity Stem Cell Research Revealed through Multi-omics Analysis.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Exploring sub-species variation in food microbiomes: a roadmap to reveal hidden diversity and functional potential.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial sample analysis has received growing attention within the last decade, driven by important findings in microbiome research and promising applications in the biotechnological field. Modern mass spectrometry-based methodology has been established in this context, providing sufficient sensitivity, resolution, dynamic range, and throughput to analyze the so-called metaproteome of complex microbial mixtures from clinical or environmental samples. While proteomic analyses were previously restricted to common model organisms, next-generation sequencing technologies nowadays allow for the rapid and cost-efficient characterization of whole metagenomes of microbial consortia and specific genomes from non-model organisms to which microbes contribute by significant amounts. This proteogenomic approach, meaning the combined application of genomic and proteomic methods, enables researchers to create a protein database that presents a tailored blueprint of the microbial sample under investigation. This contribution provides an overview of the computational challenges and opportunities in proteogenomics and metaproteomics as of January 2018. For practical application, we first showcase an integrative proteogenomic method that circumvents existing reference databases by creating sample-specific transcripts. The underlying algorithm uses a graph network approach that combines RNA-Seq and peptide information. As a second example, we provide a tutorial for a simulation tool that estimates the computational limits of detecting microbial non-model organisms. This method evaluates the potential influence of error-tolerant searches and proteogenomic approaches on databases of interest. Finally, we discuss recommendations for developing future strategies that may help overcome present limitations by combining the strengths of genome- and proteome-based methods and moving toward an integrated metaproteogenomics approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39436609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.