Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436599›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Discovering Novel Proteoforms Using Proteogenomic Workflows Within the Galaxy Bioinformatics Platform.

Praveen Kumar, James E Johnson, Thomas McGowan, Matthew C Chambers, Mohammad Heydarian, Subina Mehta, Caleb Easterly, Timothy J Griffin, Pratik D Jagtap

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Praveen KumarData Sciences & Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA.
James E JohnsonMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Thomas McGowanMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Matthew C ChambersBioinformatics and Proteome Informatics Consulting, Stamford, CT, USA.
Mohammad HeydarianR & D - Contract Testing Services - Millipore Sigma, Rockville, MD, USA.
Subina MehtaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Caleb EasterlyCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Timothy J GriffinDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Pratik D JagtapDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. pjagtap@umn.edu.

Funding

Seattle Quant: A Resource for the Skyline Software EcosystemR24GM141156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael MacCoss · 2021 to 2026
$6.7M
Expanding multiplexed kinase biosensor analysis to SWATH-MS (Part 2 of 2)U24CA199347 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRIFFIN, TIMOTHY J. · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199347NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM141156NSF 1458524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteogenomics is a growing "multi-omics" research area that combines mass spectrometry-based proteomics and high-throughput nucleotide sequencing technologies. Proteogenomics has helped in genomic annotation for organisms whose complete genome sequences became available by using high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies. Apart from genome annotation, this multi-omics approach has also helped researchers confirm expression of variant proteins belonging to unique proteoforms that could have resulted from single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), insertion and deletions (Indels), splice isoforms, or other genome or transcriptome variations.A proteogenomic study depends on a multistep informatics workflow, requiring different software at each step. These integrated steps include creating an appropriate protein sequence database, matching spectral data against these sequences, and finally identifying peptide sequences corresponding to novel proteoforms followed by variant classification and functional analysis. The disparate software required for a proteogenomic study is difficult for most researchers to access and use, especially those lacking computational expertise. Furthermore, using them disjointedly can be error-prone as it requires setting up individual parameters for each software. Consequently, reproducibility suffers. Managing output files from each software is an additional challenge. One solution for these challenges in proteogenomics is the open-source Web-based computational platform Galaxy. Its capability to create and manage workflows comprised of disparate software while recording and saving all important parameters promotes both usability and reproducibility. Here, we describe a workflow that can perform proteogenomic analysis on a Galaxy-based platform. This Galaxy workflow facilitates matching of spectral data with a customized protein sequence database, identifying novel protein variants, assessing quality of results, and classifying variants along with visualization against the genome.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteogenomicsSoftwareWorkflowDatabases, ProteinHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomicsGalaxy-PMulti-omicsProteogenomicsWorkflows

Identifiers

PMID39436599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.