ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
A Review of Protein Inference.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Identification to Insight: Making Full Use of the Diagnostic Potential of MS/MS Proteotyping in Clinical Microbiology Using Efficient Bioinformatics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein inference is an often neglected though crucial step in most proteomic experiments. In the bottom-up proteomic approach, the actual molecules of interest, the proteins, are digested into peptides before measurement on a mass spectrometer. This approach introduces a loss of information: The actual proteins must be inferred based on the identified peptides. While this might seem trivial, there are certain problems, one of the biggest being the presence of peptides that are shared among proteins. These amino acid sequences can, based on the database used for identification, belong to more than one protein. If such peptides are identified in a sample, it cannot be said which proteins actually were in the sample, but only an estimate on the most probable proteins or protein groups can be given based on a predefined inference strategy.Here we describe the effect of the chosen database for peptide identification on the number of shared peptides. Afterward, the mainly used protein inference methods will be sketched, and the necessity of stringent false discovery rate on peptide and protein level is discussed. Finally, we explain how the tool "PIA or protein inference algorithms" can be used together with the workflow environment KNIME and OpenMS to perform protein inference in a common proteomic experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39436596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.