SynthesisClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2024
Non-allergic Hypersensitivity Reactions to Immunoglobulin Preparations in Antibody Deficiencies: What Role for Anti-IgA IgG and Complement Activation?
Synthesis in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel reagent for the screening of Immunoglobulin A-deficient blood donors.Vox sanguinis · 2026Article
- International survey on the management of IgA deficiency: The BEST Collaborative Study.Vox sanguinis · 2026Article
- Practical Guidance on Initiating and Switching Targeted Immunotherapies in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A German-Austrian Expert Opinion Paper.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Reframing ATR: from the immunologic/nonimmunologic dichotomy to adaptive, innate, and physicochemical drivers within the allergy-inflammation-coagulation axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- IgA and IgM-enriched Immunoglobulins in Primary Immunodeficiencies: a Pilot Study.Journal of clinical immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of IgG anti-IgA in the serum of primary immunodeficiency (PID) patients has long been considered responsible for hypersensitivity (HS) to immunoglobulin preparations (IgPs), but this link is increasingly being questioned. The aim of this work was to describe the prevalence of IgG anti-IgA and its association with HS, and to explore a new pathophysiological hypothesis involving the complement system. We measured IgG anti-IgA, using a standardised commercial technique, in controls and PID patients, and compared our results to a systematic literature review. We measured complement activation in PID patients before and after IgP infusion, and in vitro after incubation of IgP with serum from controls and PID patients. IgG anti-IgA was detected in 6% (n = 2/32) of PID patients, 30% (n = 3/10) of selective IgA deficiency patients and 2% (n = 1/46) of healthy controls. In the literature and our study, 38 PID patients had IgG anti-IgA and HS to IgPs and 9 had IgG anti-IgA but good tolerance to IgPs. In our patients, we observed a constant complement activation after IgP infusion compared to baseline. In vitro, IgP induced significant complement activation with all sera from tested individuals. IgA immunisation is not rare in PID, higher in selective IgA deficiency, but may also occur in healthy controls. Our results question the clinical relevance and pathophysiological implication of IgG anti-IgA in the context of HS with IgPs. Complement activation-related pseudoallergy could explain the clinical characteristics and natural history of HS symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.