ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2024
Economic policy and public health: Insights from the history of the Canadian Journal of Public Health.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Well-being approaches in public health … what's new?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Income inequality and life expectancy in Canada: New evidence from province-level panel regression, 1996-2019.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025Article
- The roads not yet taken: 50 years after Lalonde, where does Public Health go from here?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025Article
- What do we mean by structural determinants of health, why is it important, and are public health communities ready to engage?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025Article
- Aligning Public Health With a Well-Being Economy: Opportunities and Challenges in Addressing Root Causes of Health Inequities Comment on "Can a Well-Being Economy Save Us?"International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Public health can no longer fence-sit politically.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nearly 115-year history of the Canadian Journal of Public Health (CJPH) provides an important opportunity to reflect on and learn from our past. In response to an invitation to members of the CJPH Editorial Board to curate historical articles around a theme, we undertook a historical examination of our field's engagement, as gleaned through the pages of CJPH, with economic policy. This was inspired by the now well-established connections among political economic policy, population well-being, and health equity. Our analysis of six historical volumes (1917, 1933, 1941, 1961, 1995, and 2013) led to three key findings. First, we found only a slim historical foundation for public health engagement with the economy overall. Second, we observed a strong and seemingly subconscious allegiance to dominant economic paradigms, despite their incompatibility with root causes of health inequities. Third, even though socio-economic inequalities in health are a long-standing preoccupation of CJPH authors, those inequalities are consistently and curiously divorced from their roots in political economic systems. Our findings provide a historical foundation for thinking about how our public health community could be encouraged to engage constructively towards an economic system that supports, rather than obstructs, population well-being and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.