ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Fluid and burns in children: What we know and what we do not know-a retrospective analysis of the German Burn Registry from 2015 to 2022.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burns in Early Childhood: Age-Specific Causes, Risks, Management, and Implications-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluid resuscitation is of great importance in the management of major burns. Various formulae have been described for calculating fluid management, especially in severely burned patients. Although the Parkland formula is widely used, its efficacy and clinical value are discussed controversially. We investigated the impact of deviation from calculated fluid volume by Parkland formula and the maintenance i.v. fluid (Parkland*) on the outcome of burned pediatric patients. Patients aged < 16 years with thermal injuries included in the German Burn Registry between January 2016 and December 2022 with a total body surface area ≥ 15% were analyzed. Using mixed-effect negative binomial regression, the association between a deviation from Parkland* in the administered fluid volume and the primary outcome length of hospital stay was estimated-additionally adjusted for known risk factors. As a secondary outcome, we use in-hospital mortality, evaluated descriptively. In 86.5% of patients, the administered fluid volume was lower than Parkland*, with pronounced deviation in the seven patients who died in the hospital. Descriptively and based on mixed-effect negative binomial regression models, we found that a positive deviation from Parkland* increases the number of hospital days, whereas a negative deviation may decrease them.
conclusionVery little is known about the role of administered resuscitation volumes for the outcome of pediatric severely burned patients. This study observed a tendency to a restricted resuscitation and its potential benefits in terms of length of hospital stay. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Fluid resuscitation is an important aspect of therapy in the acute phase of children with extensive burns. • The Parkland formula is routinely used formula for determining fluid requirements. WHAT IS NEW: • 86.5 % received less volume than determined by Parkland and a tendency to restricted resuscitation and its potential benefits in terms of length of stay was observed. • There is still considerable lack of clarity, and a strictly individualized protocol with the support of formulas is of crucial importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.