ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Combined immunohistochemical profile CD10/LMO2/MYC is a useful tool to screen MYC rearrangements in aggressive large B-cell lymphomas.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with variable biological characteristics, for which the identification of MYC rearrangements (MYCr) is a defining and prognostic feature. Both the International Consensus Classification and the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors recommend performing cytogenetic studies in all aggressive LBCL to detect MYCr. Since MYCr incidence is low, cost-effective screening tools are necessary. We asked whether the immunohistochemical combined profile of CD10, LMO2, and MYC could be a useful tool to screen for MYCr. For this purpose, we used two strategies: first, a scoring system assigning 0 points each for CD10 - , LMO2 + , and MYC - and 1 point for CD10 + , LMO2 - , and MYC + , adding the results, and second, an algorithm that selected tumors with CD10 + /LMO2 - profile and/or MYC overexpression. All analyses were performed in a training series including 482 cases from a single center and a validation series of 124 patients from two centers. The resulting system classified cases in scores from 0 to 3. Scores 0 and 1 had low MYCr (0/92 and 7/224, 3%, respectively), being higher for scores 2 (40/98, 41%) and 3 (61/68, 90%) (P < 0.001) in the training cohort. The incidence of MYCr in the validation series was as follows: score 0, 0/29 cases; score 1, 3/64 (5%); score 2, 10/23 (43.5%); score 3, 8/8 (P < 0.001). Sensitivity and negative predictive values were respectively 93.5% and 97.8% for the training and 85.7% and 96.8% for the validation cohorts. The algorithm rescued 2 and 1 MYCr cases included in score 1 from both series. In conclusion, we suggest that both approaches combining the interpretation of CD10/LMO2/MYC by immunohistochemistry are useful to screen for MYCr.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39436442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.