ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Genetic Basis of Keratoconus: New Perspectives for Clinical Translation.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes for Ocular Diseases: Therapeutic Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Keratoconus (KC) is a corneal disorder with complex etiology, apparently involving both genetic and environmental factors, characterized by progressive thinning and protrusion of the cornea. We aimed to identify novel genetic regions associated with KC susceptibility, elucidate relevant genes for disease development, and explore the translational implications for therapeutic intervention and risk assessment. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) that integrated previously published data with newly generated genotyping data from an independent European cohort. To evaluate the clinical translation of our results, we performed functional annotation, gene prioritization, polygenic risk score (PRS), and drug repositioning analyses. Results: We identified two novel genetic loci associated with KC, with rs2806689 and rs807037 emerging as lead variants (P = 1.71E-08, odds ratio [OR] = 0.88; P = 1.93E-08, OR = 1.16, respectively). Most importantly, we identified 315 candidate genes influenced by confirmed KC-associated variants. Among these, MINK1 was found to play a pivotal role in KC pathogenesis through the WNT signaling pathway. Moreover, we developed a PRS model that successfully differentiated KC patients from controls (P = 7.61E-16; area under the curve = 0.713). This model has the potential to identify individuals at high risk for developing KC, which could be instrumental in early diagnosis and management. Additionally, our drug repositioning analysis identified acetylcysteine as a potential treatment option for KC, opening up new avenues for therapeutic intervention. Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights into the genetic and molecular basis of KC, offering new targets for therapy and highlighting the clinical utility of PRS models in predicting disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.