Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39436325›Full record

SynthesisEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2025

The collateral effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: A gender-specific systematic review of disordered eating behaviour in the general population.

Nora M Laskowski, Gerrit Brandt, Cristina Ballero Reque, Luisa Sabel, Marie Pahlenkemper, Christopher Zaiser, Georgios Paslakis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nora M LaskowskiMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-5171
Gerrit BrandtMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-1599
Cristina Ballero RequeMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-7594
Luisa SabelMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1589-2785
Marie PahlenkemperMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5111-3830
Christopher ZaiserMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7643-5425
Georgios PaslakisMedical Faculty, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Luebbecke, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-0024

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01KX2121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic initiated public health measures, impacting mental health and exacerbating disordered eating behaviours (DEB). This study aims to fill gaps in understanding DEB in the general population during the pandemic, emphasising gender dynamics and the experiences of gender and/or sexual minority (SGM) individuals.

methodA systematic literature review followed PRISMA guidelines to investigate DEB during the pandemic, focusing on gender-sensitive analyses and SGM populations. Outcomes from the included studies were synthesised to identify patterns and associations related to DEB, particularly considering gender dynamics and SGM experiences.

resultsSignificant gender associations with DEB were observed, with women consistently exhibiting higher scores. SGM populations also showed elevated DEB symptoms. Longitudinal studies indicated changes in DEB over time, with some decreases observed among men.

conclusionsThe review underscores significant gender differences in DEB during the pandemic, with women exhibiting higher symptom levels. Lockdown measures had nuanced impacts on DEB, varying across studies. Various factors including pandemic-related stressors influenced DEB. Consideration of these factors can inform tailored interventions for DEB in the general population. Overall, the review enhances our understanding of how gender intersects with the pandemic's impact on DEB, emphasising the need for diverse approaches to address these behaviours.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feeding and Eating DisordersSexual and Gender MinoritiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsCOVID‐19eating disordersgender differencesLGBTQ+pandemic

Identifiers

PMID39436325
PMCPMC11786942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.