ReviewClinical and translational science2024
On placental and lactational transfer of IgG-based therapeutic proteins - Current understanding and knowledge gaps from a clinical pharmacology perspective.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Double-Edged Sword: Breast Milk-Derived Maternal Antibodies and Infant Vaccine Responses: A Narrative Review.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Ravulizumab exposure in early pregnancy.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Maternal and Fetal Antibody Exposure and Dosing Regimens During Pregnancy Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Transporters and drug secretion into human breast milk.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025Review
- Dulaglutide and pregnancy: a comprehensive safety assessment using theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- On placental and lactational transfer of IgG-based therapeutic proteins - Current understanding and knowledge gaps from a clinical pharmacology perspective.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal medication use may expose the developing fetus through placental transfer or the infant through lactational transfer. Because pregnant and lactating individuals have been historically excluded from early drug development trials, there is often limited to no human data available to inform pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in these populations at the time of drug approval. We describe the known mechanisms of placental or lactational transfer of IgG-based therapeutic proteins and use clinical examples to highlight the potential for fetal or infant exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Placental transfer of IgG-based therapeutic proteins may result in systemic exposure to the developing fetus. A lactational transfer may be associated with local gastrointestinal (GI) exposure in the infant and may also result in systemic exposure, although data are very limited as proteins have shown instability in the GI tract. Understanding of PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of IgG-based therapeutic proteins in infants exposed in utero as well as the potential exposure through human milk and its clinical implications is critical for developing treatment strategies for pregnant or lactating individuals. We share the current knowledge gaps and considerations for future evaluations to inform PK, PD, and the safety of IgG-based therapeutic proteins for safe use during pregnancy and lactation. With the increasing use of IgG-based therapeutic proteins in treating chronic diseases during pregnancy and lactation, there is a need to improve the quantity and quality of data to inform the safe use in pregnant and lactating individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.