ArticlemSphere2024
Enhanced cell stress response and protein degradation capacity underlie artemisinin resistance in
Article in mSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double Mutations inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria remains a global health burden, killing over half a million people each year. Decreased therapeutic efficacy to artemisinin, the most efficacious antimalarial, has been detected in sub-Saharan Africa, a worrying fact given that over 90% of deaths occur on this continent. Mutations in Kelch13 are the most well-established molecular marker for artemisinin resistance, but these do not explain all artemisinin-resistant isolates. Understanding the biological underpinnings of drug resistance is key to curbing the emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance. Artemisinin-mediated non-specific alkylation leads to the accumulation of misfolded and damaged proteins and activation of the parasite unfolded protein response (UPR). In addition, the parasite proteasome is vital to artemisinin resistance, as we have previously shown that chemical inhibition of the proteasome or mutations in the β2 proteasome subunit increase parasite susceptibility to dihydroartemisinin (DHA), the active metabolite of artemisinins. Here, we investigate parasites with mutations at the Kelch13 and/or 19S and 20S proteasome subunits with regard to UPR regulation and proteasome activity in the context of artemisinin resistance. Our data show that perturbing parasite proteostasis kills parasites, early parasite UPR signaling dictates DHA survival outcomes, and DHA susceptibility correlates with impairment of proteasome-mediated protein degradation. Importantly, we show that functional proteasomes are required for artemisinin resistance in a Kelch13-independent manner, and compound-selective proteasome inhibition demonstrates why artemisinin-resistant Kelch13 mutants remain susceptible to the related antimalarial peroxide OZ439. These data provide further evidence for targeting the parasite proteasome and UPR to overcome existing artemisinin resistance.IMPORTANCEDecreased therapeutic efficacy represents a major barrier to malaria treatment control strategies. The malaria proteasome and accompanying unfolded protein response are crucial to artemisinin resistance, revealing novel antimalarial therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.