ArticleDiseases of the colon and rectum2025
Socioecological Determinants of Health and the Quality of Colonoscopy in Rural Alabama.
Article in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Socioecological Determinants of Health and the Quality of Colonoscopy in Rural Alabama.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRural patients experience a higher incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer. Ensuring high-quality screening is essential to address these disparities.
objectiveTo investigate whether socioecological determinants of health are associated with colonoscopy quality in rural Alabama.
designRetrospective review.
settingData across 3 rural hospitals in Alabama from August 2021 to July 2023. PATIENTS: We included adults (aged 18 years or older) who underwent screening or diagnostic colonoscopy and completed a validated survey that measures socioecological determinants of health.
main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes included bowel preparation quality, cecal intubation, and adenoma detection rate. We linked the survey responses to these quality metrics to identify factors associated with outcomes. Analyses included the χ 2 , Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests, with a p value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsThe 84 patients surveyed were 66.7% men, 50.0% Black, and had a median age of 64 years. Optimal bowel preparation was present in 88.0%, successful cecal intubation was observed in 89.3%, and the overall adenoma detection rate was 45.8%. Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation described lower rates of internet access (60.0% vs 87.4%, p < 0.05), more difficulty in understanding written information (30.0% vs 1.4%, p < 0.05), and lacked a sense of responsibility for their health (30.0% vs 51.4%, p < 0.05) compared to those having optimal bowel preparation. Those with unsuccessful cecal intubations had lower physician trust (55.6% vs 73.3%, p < 0.05), whereas patients with successful cecal intubations were more confident in preventing health-related problems (53.3% vs 33.3%, p < 0.05) and had a more supportive social environment (72.0% vs 66.7%, p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and small sample size limiting multivariable analyses.
conclusionIn rural Alabama, lower health literacy, internet access, and physician trust were associated with low-quality colonoscopy, whereas a higher patient sense of responsibility and a supportive social environment were associated with higher-quality metrics. These findings identify potential targets for improving colonoscopy quality in rural settings. See Video Abstract. DETERMINANTES SOCIOECOLGICOS DE LA SALUD Y LA CALIDAD DE LA COLONOSCOPIA EN LAS ZONAS RURALES DE ALABAMA: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes rurales sufren una mayor incidencia y mortalidad por cáncer colorrectal. Garantizar un cribado de alta calidad es esencial para abordar estas disparidades.OBJETIVO:Investigar si los determinantes socioecológicos de la salud están asociados con la calidad de la colonoscopia en las zonas rurales de Alabama.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva.LUGAR:Datos a través de tres hospitales rurales en Alabama desde agosto de 2021 hasta julio de 2023.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron adultos (≥18 años) que se sometieron a colonoscopia de cribado o diagnóstica y completaron una encuesta validada que mide los determinantes socioecológicos de la salud.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados primarios incluyeron la calidad de la preparación intestinal, la canulazion cecal y la tasa de detección de adenomas. Vinculamos las respuestas de la encuesta a estas métricas de calidad para identificar factores asociados con los resultados. Los análisis incluyeron las pruebas χ2 , exacta de Fisher y de suma de rangos de Kruskal-Wallis, considerándose estadísticamente significativa una p < 0,05.RESULTADOS:Los 84 pacientes encuestados eran un 66,7% varones, un 50,0% de raza negra y tenían una edad media de 64 años. La preparación intestinal óptima estuvo presente en el 88,0%, el 89,3% tuvo canulazion cecales exitosas, y la tasa general de detección de adenomas fue del 45,8%. Los pacientes con una preparación intestinal subóptima describieron tasas más bajas de acceso a Internet (60,0% frente a 87,4%, p < 0,05), más dificultades para comprender la información escrita (30,0% frente a 1,4%, p < 0,05) y carecían de sentido de la responsabilidad por su salud (30,0% frente a 51,4%, p < 0,05) en comparación con los que tenían una preparación intestinal óptima. Los pacientes con canulaziones cecales fallidas tenían menos confianza en el médico (55,6% frente a 73,3%, p < 0,05), mientras que los pacientes con canulaziones cecales satisfactorias tenían más confianza en la prevención de problemas relacionados con la salud (53,3% frente a 33,3%, p < 0,05) y contaban con un entorno social más favorable (72,0% frente a 66,7%, p < 0,05).LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra limitan los análisis multivariables.CONCLUSIÓN:En las zonas rurales de Alabama, la alfabetización sanitaria, el acceso a Internet y la confianza en el médico se asociaron con una colonoscopia de baja calidad, mientras que un mayor sentido de la responsabilidad del paciente y un entorno social de apoyo se asociaron con métricas de mayor calidad. Estos hallazgos identifican objetivos potenciales para mejorar la calidad de la colonoscopia en entornos rurales. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.