Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435654›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025

Economic, Environmental, and Social Value of Virtual Care in Otolaryngology: Sustainability in Quality Improvement Framework.

Freeman Paczkowski, Karan Gandhi, Agnieszka Dzioba, Danielle S MacNeil, Lorne Parnes, Gabriele Davey, Nerissa Taylor, Julie E Strychowsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Freeman PaczkowskiSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5580-6920
Karan GandhiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-8670
Agnieszka DziobaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7609-5988
Danielle S MacNeilDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lorne ParnesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gabriele DaveyVirtual Care Program, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Nerissa TaylorVirtual Care Program, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
Julie E StrychowskyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5460-3155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveApply the Sustainability in Quality Improvement framework to virtual care for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) patients to understand the economic, environmental, and social impacts.

methodsThis project consisted of retrospective analysis of anonymized data from all appointments that took place in three academic ambulatory OHNS clinics (pediatrics, head and neck, and otology/neurotology) from fiscal years of 2021 to 2023. Data were obtained from our institution's Virtual Care Dashboard. The following metrics were calculated: travel costs avoided with virtual appointments (economic value), fuel and carbon emissions avoided with virtual appointments (environmental value), and differences in Ontario Marginalization (ON-Marg) Index scores between patients seen virtually versus in-person (social value).

resultsA total of 41,343 visits occurred over the 2-year period (18.1% virtual). Nearly all virtual visits were by telephone (99.6%). The average cost savings per virtual care visit was $87.50, and total cost savings across all 3 clinics was $640,300. Total environmental savings were 82,500 L of fuel and 246.6 metric tons of carbon emissions. There were no statistical differences in monthly average marginalization (ON-Marg) indices in patients seen virtually compared to in-person. DISCUSSION: Virtual care demonstrated financial and environmental savings for OHNS patients that can accumulate over multiple appointments. No difference in ON-Marg indices between patients assessed virtually versus in-person suggests that virtual care was accessible for patients regardless of social background. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our data suggests that virtual care may be a viable complement for delivering OHNS care that leads to fiscal and environmental savings for patients and ensures equitable access to care.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyQuality ImprovementTelemedicineCost SavingsFemaleHumansMaleOntarioRetrospective Studiescost‐savingsenvironmenthealth equityotolaryngology–head and neck surgeryPS/QIquality improvementtriple bottom linevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID39435654
PMCPMC11773438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.