Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435422›Full record

ReviewCytotechnology2024

CRISPR-edited, cell-based future-proof meat and seafood to enhance global food security and nutrition.

Aswathy Chandrababu, Jayesh Puthumana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aswathy ChandrababuNational Centre for Aquatic Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 16 India.
Jayesh PuthumanaNational Centre for Aquatic Animal Health, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 16 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food security is a major concern due to the growing population and climate change. A method for increasing food production is the use of modern biotechnology, such as cell culture, marker-assisted selection, and genetic engineering. Cellular agriculture has enabled the production of cell-cultivated meat in bioreactors that mimic the properties of conventional meat. Furthermore, 3D food printing technology has improved food production by adding new nutritional and organoleptic properties. Marker-assisted selection and genetic engineering could play an important role in producing animals and crops with desirable traits. Therefore, integrating cellular agriculture with genetic engineering technology could be a potential strategy for the production of cell-based meat and seafood with high health benefits in the future. This review highlights the production of cell-cultivated meat derived from a variety of species, including livestock, birds, fish, and marine crustaceans. It also investigates the application of genetic engineering methods, such as CRISPR/Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein), in the context of cellular agriculture. Moreover, it examines aspects such as food safety, regulatory considerations, and consumer acceptance of genetically engineered cell-cultivated meat and seafood.

Indexed as

Cell-cultivated meat and seafoodCell cultureCellular agricultureCRISPR/CasGenetic engineering

Identifiers

PMID39435422
PMCPMC11490478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.