Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435400›Full record

ArticleEarth surface processes and landforms2022

WOOD PREDICTORS IN NEOTROPICAL STREAMS: ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL CONTROLS IN AMAZON AND CERRADO CATCHMENTS.

S O Saraiva, P R Kaufmann, I Rutherfurd, C G Leal, R P Leitão, D R Macedo, P S Pompeu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth surface processes and landforms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S O SaraivaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia Aplicada, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras - MG, Brazil, 37.200-000.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-8549
P R KaufmannU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR, and Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA.
I RutherfurdSchool of Geography, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 221 Bouverie St, Carlton, 3010, Melbourne - VIC, Australia.
C G LealLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom.
R P LeitãoDepartamento de Genética Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 31270-901.
D R MacedoDepartamento de Geografia, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 31270-901.
P S PompeuDepartamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras - MG, Brazil, 37.200-900.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large wood plays a critical role providing complex habitat structure in rivers and streams. The instream wood regime consists of wood recruitment, transport, retention, and decay in river corridors. In tropical streams, transport and decay are thought to be the dominant influences on the amount instream wood stored, and these are driven by upstream forest cover, as well as catchment hydroclimatic and geomorphic characteristics. Lack of studies of the tropical wood regime leave many uncertainties. Notably, the wood regimes in the neotropical Amazon and Cerrado biomes are not known, and rapidly changing land-use threatens efforts to understand their natural wood regime. We investigated predictors of instream wood in catchments of the Amazon and Cerrado subject to a wide range of agricultural land use to identify the critical factors controlling wood recruitment and load. Using the structural equation modelling technique, we disentangled the complex net of regional and local controls. Contrary to our expectations, local drivers, such as the relation between the piece size and channel dimensions, discharge, stream power and riparian forest were the most important predictors of instream wood. The amounts of wood found in these streams were primarily the result of the wood delivered by the local riparian forest and how much of that wood remains trapped. Therefore, the preservation of the forested riparian zones in Amazon and Cerrado streams is crucial for maintaining the sources of wood as well as the channel morphology capable of trapping and retaining instream wood. Further research should compare reference and disturbed streams to quantify the influence of anthropogenic activities on instream wood and its primary influences. This information would facilitate assessing the extent of human alteration and developing mitigating measures to arrest or reverse changes that reduce instream wood and degrade aquatic and riparian habitat in neotropical rivers and streams.

Indexed as

agriculture landscapechannel featurescontemporary wood regimeinstream woodwood budget

Identifiers

PMID39435400
PMCPMC11492989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.