ArticleJapanese journal of comprehensive rehabilitation science2024
A comparative study of changes in H
Article in Japanese journal of comprehensive rehabilitation science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for patients with chronic stroke: a case report using an AB design.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kiso A, Maeda H, Otaka Y, Mori H, Kagaya H. A comparative study of changes in H Objective: We have developed a compact device using a spinning permanent magnet (SPM) that induces an electrical field by changing the magnetic flux. We hypothesized that SPM stimulation also reduced spasticity, comparable with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). This study evaluated the effect of a single session of SPM stimulation and compared it with those of rPMS and TENS in healthy individuals. Methods: Eleven healthy adult men participated in this study. The active electrode was placed on the soleus muscle, and the reference electrode was placed at 5 cm distal from the active electrode on the medial side of the Achilles tendon. The stimulating electrodes were fixed on the popliteal fossa to stimulate the tibial nerve. The maximum H-reflex (H Results: Compared with the control, H Conclusion: SPM stimulation reduced H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.