Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435357›Full record

Trial reportOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024

Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on body composition in people with osteoarthritis: Secondary analysis of the "Plants for Joints" randomized controlled trial.

C A Wagenaar, W Walrabenstein, C S de Jonge, M Bisschops, M van der Leeden, M van der Esch, P J M Weijs, M A Troelstra, M A Korteweg, A J Nederveen and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

C A WagenaarReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
W WalrabensteinReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C S de JongeAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M BisschopsReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M van der LeedenReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M van der EschReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P J M WeijsDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M A TroelstraAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M A KortewegReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A J NederveenAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D van SchaardenburgReade Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Plants for Joints (PFJ) intervention significantly improved pain, stiffness, and physical function, and metabolic outcomes, in people with metabolic syndrome-associated osteoarthritis (MSOA). This secondary analysis investigated its effects on body composition. Method: In the randomized PFJ study, people with MSOA followed a 16-week intervention based on a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and stress management, or usual care. For this secondary analysis, fat mass, muscle mass, and bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for all participants. Additionally, in a subgroup ( Results: Of 66 people randomized, 64 (97%) completed the study. The PFJ group experienced significant weight loss (-5.2 ​kg; 95% CI -6.9, -3.6) compared to controls, primarily from fat mass reduction (-3.9 ​kg; 95% CI -5.3 to -2.5). No significant differences were found in lean mass, muscle strength, or bone mineral density between groups. In the subgroup who underwent MRI scans, the PFJ group had a greater reduction in HCL (-6.5%; 95% CI -9.9, 3.0) compared to controls, with no observed differences in VAT composition. Conclusion: The PFJ multidisciplinary intervention positively impacted clinical and metabolic outcomes, and appears to significantly reduce body fat, including liver fat, while preserving muscle mass and strength.

Indexed as

Body compositionDietLifestyle interventionMagnetic resonance imagingMetabolic syndromeOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID39435357
PMCPMC11491948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.