Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435330›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Pilot study of a real-time early agitation capture technology (REACT) for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Nibraas Khan, Abigale Plunk, Zhaobo Zheng, Deeksha Adiani, John Staubitz, Amy Weitlauf, Nilanjan Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nibraas KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-3119
Abigale PlunkDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Zhaobo ZhengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Deeksha AdianiDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
John StaubitzTreatment and Research Institute for Autism Spectrum Disorders, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Amy WeitlaufTreatment and Research Institute for Autism Spectrum Disorders, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Nilanjan SarkarDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Children and adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), particularly those with autism spectrum disorder, are at increased risk of challenging behaviors such as self-injury, aggression, elopement, and property destruction. To mitigate these challenges, it is crucial to focus on early signs of distress that may lead to these behaviors. These early signs might not be visible to the human eye but could be detected by predictive machine learning (ML) models that utilizes real-time sensing. Current behavioral assessment practices lack such proactive predictive models. This study developed and pilot-tested real-time early agitation capture technology (REACT), a real-time multimodal ML model to detect early signs of distress, termed "agitations." Integrating multimodal sensing, ML, and human expertise could make behavioral assessments for people with IDD safer and more efficient. Methods: We leveraged wearable technology to collect behavioral and physiological data from three children with IDD aged 6 to 9 years. The effectiveness of the REACT system was measured using F1 score, assessing its usefulness at the time of agitation to 20s prior. Results: The REACT system was able to detect agitations with an average F1 score of 78.69% at the time of agitation and 68.20% 20s prior. Conclusion: The findings support the use of the REACT model for real-time, proactive detection of agitations in children with IDD. This approach not only improves the accuracy of detecting distress signals that are imperceptible to the human eye but also increases the window for timely intervention before behavioral escalation, thereby enhancing safety, well-being, and inclusion for this vulnerable population. We believe that such technological support system will enhance user autonomy, self-advocacy, and self-determination.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderchallenging behaviorsMachine learningmultimodal datawearable sensing

Identifiers

PMID39435330
PMCPMC11492225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.