Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care2024

Wearables for the Bladder: Stakeholder Perspectives on Moving Multiple Sclerosis Bladder Dysfunction Interventions Into the 21st Century.

Valerie J Block, Leah McIntyre Née Wylie, Nikki Sisodia, Michelle E Van Kuiken, Anne M Suskind, Riley Bove

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07451106 (Exploring Clinical Utility of Wearables for the Bladder in Pelvic Health Physical Therapy Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07451106 recruitingnot on this map

Exploring Clinical Utility of Wearables for the Bladder in Pelvic Health Physical Therapy Clinics

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsPostpartum Bladder Dysfunction, Post-prostatectomy Bladder Dysfunction, Bladder DysfunctionArmsDFree Non-Invasive Bladder Ultrasound, Perifit Kegel Exerciser, Exit interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sensors in Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerie J BlockFrom the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-5484
Leah McIntyre Née WylieDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Nikki SisodiaFrom the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Michelle E Van KuikenDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Anne M SuskindDepartment of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Riley BoveFrom the Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder dysfunction (BD) is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and can reduce participation in daily life. Detecting BD early allows for effective prevention-focused treatments such as pelvic floor physical therapy. Pairing neurotechnology with patient-reported outcomes to remotely measure BD could significantly improve monitoring and treatment of BD. Therefore, we describe the process and findings of stakeholder engagement from a human-centered design process to assemble a wearables for the bladder (WeB) kit.

methodsFour people with MS with varying BD severity, and 5 MS clinical/research experts had 4 virtual meetings. Commercially available bladder tools were graded for ability to evaluate, monitor, or treat BD. The Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (utility, usability, feasibility) was used for evaluation. Scoring was performed individually and as a group.

resultsOf the 11 devices, 5 obtained mean scores of greater than 6 of 10 for likability, usability, and device utility. The 2 highest scoring (9/10) devices were selected for the pilot. One device measures bladder urine levels, reporting the number/frequency of voids/leaks; the other guides pelvic floor exercises by pairing games on an app with biofeedback from intravaginal sensors. We uncovered critical differences in experts' and patients' appreciation of the tools, and the collaborative engagement led to substantial revisions of initial tool scores.

conclusionsThis process underscores the critical role of stakeholder engagement in the selection of digital tools, especially in sensitive domains like pelvic function. Ongoing clinical validation of the selected tools will yield a validated, user-friendly WeB kit that is able to fill gaps in our ability to evaluate BD treatments in people with MS, ultimately reducing the impact of BD on quality of life.

Indexed as

bladder dysfunctionMS bladderwearables

Identifiers

PMID39435303
PMCPMC11491565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.