ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Creating an interactive database for nasopharyngeal carcinoma management: applying machine learning to evaluate metastasis and survival.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Simultaneous Presentation of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Latent Cervical Tuberculosis: Insights into a Complex Case.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning for predicting distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Exploring the prognostic value of EBV DNA in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy using AI-based modeling.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- P-MES: Explainable pathology-based distant metastasis risk stratification in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients frequently present with distant metastasis (DM), which is typically associated with poor prognosis. This study aims to develop and apply machine learning models to predict DM, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in NPC patients to provide optimal tools for improved predictive accuracy and performance. Methods: We retrieved over 8,000 NPC patient samples with associated clinical information from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Utilizing two methods for handling missing values-imputation or deletion-we created various cohorts: DM-all, DM-slim, OS-all, OS-slim, CSS-all, and CSS-slim. Five machine learning models were deployed for the binary classification task of DM, and their performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). For the survival prediction tasks of OS and CSS, we constructed 45 combinations using nine survival machine learning algorithms. The Concordance Index (C-index), 5-year AUC, and Brier score assessed model accuracy. Patients were stratified into two risk groups for survival analysis, and the survival curves were presented. Results: This study examines the relationships between clinical factors and survival in NPC patients. The analysis, visualized through forest plots, indicates that demographic and clinical variables like gender, marital status, tumor grade, and stage significantly affect metastatic risks and survival. Specifically, factors such as advanced stages increase metastasis and survival risks, while enhanced treatments improve survival rates. In the cohort for DM prediction, results revealed that the random forest model was the most effective, with an AUC of 0.687. In contrast, when predicting overall survival (OS), the random survival forest (RSF) model consistently showed superior performance with the highest mean C-index of 0.802, a 5-year AUC of 0.857, and a Brier score of 0.167. Similarly, for cancer-specific survival (CSS) prediction, the RSF model demonstrated a mean C-index of 0.822, a 5-year AUC of 0.884, and a Brier score of 0.165. An online Shiny server was developed to allow the models to be used freely and efficiently via http://npcml.shinyapps.io/NPCpre. Conclusion: This study successfully established an online tool by machine learning models for NPC metastasis and survival prediction, providing valuable references for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.