ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjuvant therapies by anthocyanins potentially mitigating drug resistance and metastatic disease risks in stratified breast cancers: the 3PM-conceptual innovation targeted to NF-kappaB/EMT plasticity.The EPMA journal · 2026Article
- Development and Biological Evaluation ofPolymers · 2026Article
- Natural Plant Bioactives as Regulators of Histone Modifications: Bridging Epigenetics and Anticancer Therapy.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2026Review
- Review
- Redox Control in Platelet Activity and Therapy.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Combating Sarcopenia Through Nutrition: Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties ofNutrients · 2025Review
- Inorganic Element Identification and In Vitro Preliminary Evaluation of Three Types of Standardized Black Chokeberry Extracts Against Human Pulmonary Artery Endothelial Cells (HPAECs).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Within oncology research, there is a high effort for new approaches to prevent and treat cancer as a life-threatening disease. Specific plant species that adapt to harsh conditions may possess unique properties that may be utilized in the management of cancer. Hypothesis: Chokeberry fruit is rich in secondary metabolites with anti-cancer activities potentially useful in cancer prevention and treatment. Aims of the study and Methods: Based on mentioned hypothesis, the main goal of our study was to evaluate the antitumor effects of dietary administered Results: The dominant metabolites in the Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze the antitumor effect of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.