Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435272›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2024

Prognostic Value of Pathological Response for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Conversion Surgery.

Zhen-Xin Zeng, Jia-Yi Wu, Jun-Yi Wu, Zhi-Bo Zhang, Kai Wang, Shao-Wu Zhuang, Bin Li, Jian-Yin Zhou, Zhong-Tai Lin, Shu-Qun Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic Value of Pathological Response After Conversion Therapy and Salvage Surgery in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhen-Xin ZengShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jia-Yi WuShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Jun-Yi WuShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhi-Bo ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Shao-Wu ZhuangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jian-Yin ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Zhong-Tai LinDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shu-Qun LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Yi-Nan LiShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yang-Kai FuShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Mao-Lin YanShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (triple therapy) has displayed encouraging clinical outcomes for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We aimed to explore the prognostic value of pathological response (PR) in patients with initially uHCC who underwent conversion surgery following triple therapy and identify predictors of major pathological response (MPR). Methods: A total of 76 patients with initially uHCC who underwent conversion surgery following triple therapy were retrospectively analyzed. PR was calculated as the proportion of nonviable tumor cell surface area of the whole tumor bed surface area. MPR was identified when PR was ≥90%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as the absence of viable tumor cells. Results: MPR and pCR were identified in 53 (69.7%) and 25 (32.9%) patients, respectively. The 1- and 2-year overall survival in patients with MPR were significantly higher than in those without MPR (100.0% and 91.3% vs. 67.7% and 19.4%; Conclusion: The presence of MPR or pCR could improve prognosis in patients with initially uHCC who underwent conversion surgery following triple therapy. The PR may become a surrogate marker for predicting the prognosis of these patients.

Indexed as

Conversion surgeryHepatocellular carcinomaOverall survivalPathological responsePredictive factorRecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

PMID39435272
PMCPMC11493390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.