Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435271›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2024

Characterization of Tumor Responses in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib in the Phase 3 Randomized Trial: REFLECT.

Richard S Finn, Shukui Qin, Fabio Piscaglia, Thomas R Jeffry Evans, Jennifer J Knox, Carlos López López, Zahra Ramji, Min Ren, Kalgi Mody, Arndt Vogel and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Richard S FinnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shukui QinDirector of the Chinese PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Fabio PiscagliaDivision of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Disease, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Thomas R Jeffry EvansBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jennifer J KnoxPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carlos López LópezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, UNICAN, Santander, Spain.
Zahra RamjiMedical Affairs, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Min RenBiostatistics, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Kalgi ModyClinical Research, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Arndt VogelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Cancer Research UK 11650Cancer Research UK 20409Cancer Research UK 29827NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In REFLECT, lenvatinib was noninferior to sorafenib in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC; median 13.6 vs. 12.3 months; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06). The objective response rate (ORR) with lenvatinib was 18.8% by blinded independent imaging review (IIR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); per modified RECIST (mRECIST), the ORR was 40.6%. We sought to further characterize these tumor responses and explore ORR's importance among outcomes for patients with HCC. Methods: Efficacy assessments included all patients randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib treatment (if bodyweight ≥60 kg, 12 mg/day; if <60 kg, 8 mg/day). Time to first objective response (TTR) and duration of response (DOR) included patients who achieved a partial or complete tumor response. Tumors were assessed by IIR per RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST. Results: Four hundred seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib. By IIR, 90 patients (18.8%) achieved an objective response per RECIST v1.1, and 194 (40.6%) had an objective response per mRECIST. Median TTR/DOR were 2.8 months/7.4 months in responders per RECIST v1.1, and 1.9 months/7.3 months in responders per mRECIST, respectively. Per baseline disease characteristics, ORRs by Child-Pugh score (A5/A6) were 21.2%/11.2% per RECIST v1.1 and 42.9%/33.6% per mRECIST, respectively. By baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (<400/≥400 ng/mL), ORRs were 21.4%/15.4% per RECIST v1.1 and 45.6%/33.8% per mRECIST, respectively. Incidences of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were 98.9% in responders per RECIST v1.1 and 97.9% in responders per mRECIST. Conclusions: Responses were seen even in those patients with more severe disease at baseline. Tumor responses occurred early and were durable.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLenvatinibObjective response

Identifiers

PMID39435271
PMCPMC11493383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.