ArticleCureus2024
Audit of the Acute Management of Renal Colic in District Hospitals Within a National Health Service Trust.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological Investigation of Acute Renal Colic: A Two-Cycle Clinical Audit.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Ketamine and Midazolam with Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) and Ketorolac in Renal Colic Patients: A Clinical Trail : Comparison of the Ketamine and Midazolam with Paracetamol and Ketorolac.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Article
- A Commentary on Effect of Early-Intervention Acupuncture on Pain Relief Among Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Acute Renal Colic Due to Urinary Calculi: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRenal colic is a prevalent acute urological emergency caused by urinary stones and commonly manifests as severe loin pain. This audit assesses the management of acute renal colic at a National Health Service (NHS) Trust in the West Midlands, England, comparing practices against the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) guidelines.
methodThis retrospective audit reviewed 417 patients with suspected renal colic over a month. Data collected included patients' demographics, time to complete CT scan, laboratory investigations requested and management modalities. Patients assessed were either admitted through the Emergency Department, Surgical Assessment Unit, or previously admitted for other conditions on the wards. The audit benchmarked against NICE and BAUS guidelines, focusing on diagnostic timeliness and management, including essential blood investigations. Data analysis performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) included descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 417 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age of patients was 47.4 years with slightly higher male population (51.1%). The diagnostic rate for renal or ureteric stones using computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) was 41.2%. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in males (54%) compared to females (27.5%) while females have more alternate diagnosis than males (13.7% vs 6.1%). The average completion time of CT-KUB was nine hours with 7.7% of patients having their CT-KUB beyond the 24-hour benchmark. Most patients (48%) were managed conservatively with analgesia, 32% received tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy and others had interventions like ureteric stent insertion (9.3%), nephrostomy (6.4%) or primary ureteroscopy (4.1%).
conclusionThe audit of renal colic management at our centre revealed a 41.2% diagnostic rate for renal or ureteric stones via CT-KUB, with a significantly higher rate in males than females. Diagnostic delays were minimal, with only 7.7% of scans exceeding 24 hours. Conservative management was common, however non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were underutilized despite guideline recommendations. There was a notable gender disparity in diagnostic and alternate findings rates. The results showed the need for adherence to pain management protocols and highlight the effectiveness of existing renal colic protocol, while also pointing to potential areas for improvement in treatment uniformity and guideline adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.