Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435248›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Audit of the Acute Management of Renal Colic in District Hospitals Within a National Health Service Trust.

Habeeb Abdulrasheed, Ayokunle Adenipekun, Mohamed S Mohsin, Muhammad Ali Khattak, Waleed Elsayed, Haajra Cheema, Ivo Dukic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Habeeb AbdulrasheedUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Ayokunle AdenipekunUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Mohamed S MohsinUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Muhammad Ali KhattakUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Waleed ElsayedUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Haajra CheemaUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Ivo DukicUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRenal colic is a prevalent acute urological emergency caused by urinary stones and commonly manifests as severe loin pain. This audit assesses the management of acute renal colic at a National Health Service (NHS) Trust in the West Midlands, England, comparing practices against the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) guidelines.

methodThis retrospective audit reviewed 417 patients with suspected renal colic over a month. Data collected included patients' demographics, time to complete CT scan, laboratory investigations requested and management modalities. Patients assessed were either admitted through the Emergency Department, Surgical Assessment Unit, or previously admitted for other conditions on the wards. The audit benchmarked against NICE and BAUS guidelines, focusing on diagnostic timeliness and management, including essential blood investigations. Data analysis performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) included descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.

resultsA total of 417 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age of patients was 47.4 years with slightly higher male population (51.1%). The diagnostic rate for renal or ureteric stones using computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT-KUB) was 41.2%. The positive detection rate was significantly higher in males (54%) compared to females (27.5%) while females have more alternate diagnosis than males (13.7% vs 6.1%). The average completion time of CT-KUB was nine hours with 7.7% of patients having their CT-KUB beyond the 24-hour benchmark. Most patients (48%) were managed conservatively with analgesia, 32% received tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy and others had interventions like ureteric stent insertion (9.3%), nephrostomy (6.4%) or primary ureteroscopy (4.1%).

conclusionThe audit of renal colic management at our centre revealed a 41.2% diagnostic rate for renal or ureteric stones via CT-KUB, with a significantly higher rate in males than females. Diagnostic delays were minimal, with only 7.7% of scans exceeding 24 hours. Conservative management was common, however non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were underutilized despite guideline recommendations. There was a notable gender disparity in diagnostic and alternate findings rates. The results showed the need for adherence to pain management protocols and highlight the effectiveness of existing renal colic protocol, while also pointing to potential areas for improvement in treatment uniformity and guideline adherence.

Indexed as

acute renal colicmedical expulsive therapynon contrast ctkubobstructive kidney stonesureteric stent

Identifiers

PMID39435248
PMCPMC11491764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.